Yes and No.
I dont support the death penalty as a whole but I do believe some crimes warrant it. You have to look into the extenuating circumstances on everything, nothing is the same.
Saddam was evil and did torture his own people, but at the same time, our country supplied him with weapons and helped keep him in power, so where is our responsibility in this?
Politically I think it will benefit the Republicans greatly and re energize their core base into thinking they are doing something.
In Iraq I dont think it will help any since he at sentencing he ya know told his people to overthrow the infidels(us)
So we shall see wont we.
2006-11-05 01:44:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Again no it is not right because Saddam Hussein was sentenced by America & British not by Iraqi people . Saddam is right saying that the TRIBUNAL was the Mouthpiece of America.
2006-11-05 02:02:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course he should be killed. Hanging is too good for him.
I am sickened by the hateful, malicious comments aimed at our President while enjoying the freedoms and advantages you have in the U.S. You are more evil than I ever imagened people could be. I guess Satan is alive and well in the USA and he has many willing solders. God help you evil, stupid people who have no idea what you are saying or why you as saying it. You simply want to spread hate. You would love to see more bombings, death and destruction on American soil. Do decent US citizens of all parties, races, faiths and go away. You are destroying us.
2006-11-05 02:00:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, the trial was was not impartial and hanging him now only amounts to wilful murder of the same kind Saddam practiced on his own people.
Politically, I do not know. Traditionally getting rid of the old ruler is a way of the new government to assert their authority, so, perhaps in that case it is useful for the Iraqi government.
2006-11-05 01:44:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by dane 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
first of all, it is not as much as me to jot down undesirable issues approximately Saddam Hussein, by using fact the certainty he invaded Kuwait merely grew to become to be useful for me in getting a flight fee ticket from Israel to South Africa for a existence like fee whilst i mandatory it (and traditionally, unlike Mad Albright, Saddam Hussein is customary to be gratefull to those who helped him interior the previous). yet because you have asked the question, then my answer is that it sounds existence like for him to receive some sentence (even dying by potential of a taking photos, as desirable for a former head of state-no longer by potential of awesome), yet then he must be granted amnesty, as a reward for status against the Bullshit father and son, besides as against Penis Clinton.
2016-12-28 13:34:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by gerda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and yes.Ask some of the families he tortured to death this question..
Man oh man, listen to all of these terrorists who answered this say no.They are all for killing George Bush but can't stand the thought of Saddam getting killed.How sad...
2006-11-05 01:47:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by BAARAAACK 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
If you ask his victims I think they're in favor and my opinion is his own govt should have the honors. It's time someone starts defining right from wrong, and all countries should be more than ready if those terrorists try to take these matter into their own hands.
2006-11-05 01:43:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't believe in the death penalty, but surely it was appropriate in his case. I hope it's slow enough that he can savor it and make a fool of himself again.
2006-11-05 03:31:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely! Absolutely!
2006-11-05 01:50:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by lindakflowers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, on both counts. He was a madman who murdered his own people and I think the sentence fits the crime.
2006-11-05 01:40:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
5⤊
2⤋