English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

No. At higher levels, the electron will get more potential energy as it is more separated from the nucleus. As the electron goes away from the nucleus the attraction between them decreases and the potential energy increases. But there is no change in the mass

2006-11-05 00:52:17 · answer #1 · answered by ADITYA V 3 · 0 0

In Koine Greek, there is not any indefinite article ("a"); interior the absence of a different article ("the") an indefinite article is regularly rightly assumed, yet jointly as there is not any specific article in front of "God" in John a million:a million, we ought to consistently no longer assume an indefinite article. The text fabric reads actually: "?? ???? ?? ? ?????, ??? ? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????, ??? ???? ?? ? ?????." In beginning grew to become into the observe and the observe grew to become into with the God, and God grew to become into the observe. John has achieved a competent job of making this sentence so as that he the two broadcasts Christ to be God jointly as additionally retaining that Christ and the daddy are actually not an identical individual. Had he pronounced that the observe grew to become into THE God, with a different article, he might have pronounced as Jesus and the daddy thoroughly an identical, which all of us comprehend isn't the case. yet whilst they are actually not an identical, why no longer call "the observe" (Jesus) yet another god? seem on the 2nd clause in specific (??? ???? ?? ? ?????. - and God grew to become into the observe.) observe that John has positioned God, no longer the observe, at first of the clause. it somewhat is how a speaker of Koine further emphasis to a observe, as though to underline it. So John is emphasizing Jesus' Godhood jointly as nonetheless keeping apart his personhood from the daddy, no longer transforming into a polytheistic plurality of Gods. Had he switched the order and positioned "a god" on the tip of the clause, then the indefinite article assumption could have been a sprint greater existence like. The context of the full of scripture must be an sufficient handbook to respond to the question regardless of the shown fact that, as there is merely one God, and there must be no valid "a god." The NWT additionally makes many glaring interpretive errors and should no longer be depended on usually. for occasion, it erroneously inserts Jehovah each and every time the Greek of course says "lord." This demonstrates the glaring biases of the translators in desire of a undeniable theological view.

2016-12-28 13:32:43 · answer #2 · answered by gerda 4 · 0 0

Bohr's model didn't take account of changes of mass at all so no.

He used the 'reduced mass' two body formulation to simplify the math , maybe this is where the confusion arises?

2006-11-05 01:50:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

whoa

2006-11-05 00:55:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers