Terrorist changes with time. For example when George Washington was fighting a war to make America a free country from the British, the britishers called him a terrorist! And at the moment the Bush administration is calling Muslims as terrorist.
It was never proved that the Muslims carried out the 9/11 attack,
People now saying that the whole attack could have been carried out the Bush government it self! This is because he wanted to boost his ratings on his war on terror! This would than further lead to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Thus they would have real presence in the central Asian region by attacking these countries.
The excuse for attacking Iraq was that the country had WMDs which could not be proved even today. After the war is over peace is still not established. Several allied soldiers were killed during the war.
I personaly think the biggest terrorist is George W. Bush!
who is responsible?
Who else the Bush Administration!
2006-11-05 00:39:11 · 20 answers · asked by Realcharm 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Definitely the USA since about 1980. Reagan, Bush I, Clinton and the smirking chimp would all be tried for war crimes for the terrorist campaigns they waged against various peoples and countries. Al Qaeda et al are bush-league compared to our terrorist-in-chiefs.
And let me stipulate, I don't think there is any credible evidence the smirking chimp had anything to do with 9/11. But the brutal bombing and sanction campaign we've carried out against Iraq is pure terrorism.
2006-11-05 00:43:03 · answer #1 · answered by spongeworthy_us 6 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist. He makes no secret of this fact and calls for attacks on all who do agree with him. George Bush is the president of The United States. He is not calling for the eradication of anyone. The war in Iraq could end tommorow if the insurgents and those involved in sectarian violence would lay down their arms and strive for peace in the region. Indeed Freedom Fighters are often called terrorists. The differences which you fail to grasp between the two situations you mention are below.
1) The American Revolutionaries did not call for the eradication of the British. They also did not pursue the British to their home country in order to carry out additional attacks.
2) The American revolutionaries were called terrorists by the British because of tactics used. They had the audacity to hide behind rocks and trees, rather than lining up in a straight line to fight the British head on.
3) The American revolutionaries did not intentionally target the civillian population in order to wage war against the British.
Your contention about 9/11 is without basis and betrays a misinformed mindset. There has been no credible evidence presented to date to properly indict the Bush Administration. Instead what we have is supposition and a general tendancy to ignore fact and eye witness testimony in order to make a radical case which cannot stand on actual examination of facts. In the case of whether Islamics perpetrated the attacks we have ample evidence of their complicity, not the least of which is the claim by Osama Bin Laden that he orchestrated the attacks.
2006-11-05 01:08:14 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, I hate Bush. Completely. But I think it might be slightly far-fetched to say that Washington carried out 9/11. Do I think there are secrets that Washington isn't divulging? Absolutely.
Is Bush a terrorist? Sure, in some ways. He's terrorizing the 50+% of people in this country that don't agree with his "war on terror." He's terrorizing us with his lies, and his "presidential powers" and authority.
He's the biggest moron there ever was.
Now the big black vans will be arriving at my house. Seems that even freedom of speech is going by the wayside.
2006-11-05 00:43:54 · answer #3 · answered by AnswerMom 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I see the Bush Derangement Syndrome lingers on. some human beings would desire to advance up. A monument of him smiling as he's familiar with you would be crying later, how's that. thank you human beings, stupid costs for my article.
2016-10-21 07:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So who carried out the train bombings in Madrid? I could mention more, but I want to hear these conspiracy theories about these other terrorist attacks
2006-11-05 00:41:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 2⤋
People are not conspiracy theorists. If nothing else, I believe my eyes and ears seeing the planes crash into the towers and hearing the call from passengers on Flight 93, and stewardess calls. Pay no attention to such nonsense, if you are smart.
2006-11-05 00:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yet another Kool Aid drinking wackadoo - 2 points
2006-11-05 00:42:17 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 7⤊ 4⤋
So... who are you?... Chief propaganda minister for CAIR? Or just some other generic Islamic group? Just as likely you're just a leftist, American hating liberal jerk (IMHO)
2006-11-05 01:10:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Why do you even bother, these people get their news limbaugh and fox? They have no clue.
2006-11-05 01:07:23 · answer #9 · answered by crct2004 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
bush .
look at the now.
2006-11-05 00:46:30 · answer #10 · answered by Gia Star 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋