Three English Questions, Please Help.?

Question

1.How can I say "9/11" when I am reading "the effects of the 9/11 incident" ?

2.What is the meaning by "edit out" in "Whitman says that she did not object when the White House edited out cautionary notes by EPA scientists." ?

3.What does "lean on...to lie" mean in "somebody surely leaned on the EPA to lie"?

Please put the second and the third ones into the simplest English if possible.

Answer 1

1. Just say "nine eleven".

2. Edit out means to remove certain text from a document. This removal of text could be for various reasons such as security, vulgarity, cautionary notes, etc.

3. Lean on means to exert pressure on someone to influence their thinking. We could change this sentence to read:
"Someone must have used their powerful influence to cause the EPA to make false statements".

Answer 2

the effects of nine eleven incident

2. when you edit
-you change or delete some of the sentence example; your sentence, edited.......

Whitman did not object cautionary notes by EPA scientists
............this leaves out the White House involvement

Whitman notes by EPA scientists.
...........this leaves out the fact that they were edited

3. Lean on means to --pressure the person into doing what they do not want to do.

Lean on means to ---make the persons do something wrong, because of threat

Answer 3

1. Say nine eleven
2. The White House told her to take out stuff they didn't want the public to know... probably things that would work against the President.
3. Put on pressure: lie or else!

Answer 4

1) Just say 9/11
2) "Edit out" means to erase or omit from the text.
3) "Lean on" means ,(in this context), put pressure on.
making him lie by putting pressure on him.

Answer 5

1) You say "nine eleven"

2) Means "to delete."

3) Menas "to put pressure on to lie."

Answer 6

a million not one of the pronounced ideas are maximum remarkable, "0.5 his earnings" or 0.5 of his earnings" may well be maximum remarkable. in case you had to rigidity the element that he relatively gave her 0.5 of each little thing he made, no longer 0.5 of a few smaller element, you need to assert "0.5 his total earnings" or "0.5 of his total earnings". 2 A or D are maximum remarkable, yet seek advice from 2 different circumstances. the two B and C are incorrect, because of the fact that use of "had" makes the guy's coat-sitting previous demanding, wherein case, as this is no longer taking place, there is no difficulty for the guy to stand up and get off the bus. In A, the the coat-sitter has in basic terms gotten on the bus on an identical end the place the different individual desires to get off and in sitting on the coat, is battling the guy from getting as much as get off. In D, the coat-sitting has got here approximately at some previous end and the guy has basically now in basic terms observed it in being prevented from getting as much as get off the bus. 3 In uncomplicated communique, the two B or C may well be maximum remarkable, in spite of the undeniable fact that in case you have been writing an essay, C may well be the final. the rule of thumb is that if the two "that" and "which" sound ok, use "which".