was one word not ever accepted as having had been said until recent years).
2006-11-05 00:17:20 · 7 answers · asked by charly 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I'm pleased with the answers. I had not realized this 'till a short time ago.
Thanks
2006-11-05 02:35:57 · update #1
"...one small step for A man...one giant leap for mankind..." the 'A' in the sentence was recently recognized.
2006-11-05 00:20:46 · answer #1 · answered by visionsofforever 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There was a gap between "for" and "man" . People recently studying the recording decided that Armstrong said "a" but a glitch in the radio dropped it from the transmission.
2006-11-05 04:17:27 · answer #2 · answered by Nomadd 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your instructor ought to no longer be qualified, by using fact the information in desire of the Moon landings is merely overwhelming. that may not my very own subjective opinion, yet somewhat a scientific certainty. in case you like to talk this along with your instructor, those are some key products of information in desire of Apollo: a million) a number of of the landings left in the back of retroreflectors that astronomers have detected 1000's of cases. those are used to exactly degree the gap to the Moon. 2) autonomous radio telescopes examined the presence of a spacecraft on the Moon. whilst those telescopes have been pointed on the Moon, they detected the Apollo transmissions. If there wasn't deliver there, they might not have detected something. 3) Geologists have heavily examined the Moon rocks and have concluded that they are certainly lunar in commencing place. those rocks experience completely with Moon rocks back by potential of an unmanned Soviet probe. there is not any thank you to faux this. 4) No scientist rejects the landings, yet scientists could be the 1st to observe something fishy. somewhat, scientists are the 1st to vigorously shelter the landings. On desirable of all of that, there is not any information against a landing. The conspiracy theorists count solely upon undesirable technological expertise, defective consumer-friendly experience, anti-government bias, and, greater regularly, fiction that's made to appear as if certainty. That we have not back to the Moon because 1972 potential extremely no longer something. Going to the Moon is astronomically high priced and fraught with danger. NASA's funds merely would not enable for it to pass returned to the Moon. Following your instructor's logic: i've got no longer been to California in seven years; for this reason, because i've got no longer back in a jointly as, I in no way went interior the 1st place. that's a remarkably illogical viewpoint. To reject the lunar landings and the information helping them is to reject cutting-edge technological expertise.
2016-12-28 13:31:22 · answer #3 · answered by gerda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there was a rcovery of an "A" and I think the phraze was clechea for a clobber of the sentance for a giant leap for a frog or something.
2006-11-06 08:47:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He said, "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind."
The word "a" was clobbered by static.
2006-11-05 02:12:34 · answer #5 · answered by Otis F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"One small step for man. One giant leap for mankind!"
2006-11-05 00:20:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
.................. longest journey stats with a small first step ............
......... he said it in another way ........... small step for him .......... but giant leap for mankind ...................
2006-11-05 00:29:56 · answer #7 · answered by spaceman 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋