Do you think killng two, three or a hundred persons is worst than killing one? I think that one person worth infinite, so killing two persons is still infinitelly bad. The one you killed may could be the next Mozart, the next Jesus or the next Einstein. I think you can`t add the people value. You can't say that killing 10 is better than killing 10000. One of those 10 could be your son. people are not oranges or apples that you can mesure mathematically. If you kill just one, you have already crossed the limit, and beyond that limit, there is no possible measurement.
2006-11-04
22:53:21
·
6 answers
·
asked by
juaneco_el_lokeko
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I don't know why I wrote that title, the custion isn't really about that
2006-11-04
22:57:02 ·
update #1
Hey please!! forget about the title!!! Is not about that!!!! My bad!!! It's about... hey you are right, if you kill, you chose death, I'm agree, but plz, read the cuestion carefully, forget about saddam is not about that.
2006-11-04
23:06:30 ·
update #2
I think that the sad thing is not how many people dies. I think dead is not the real sad thing, I think the sad think is people killing people; death is just natural. I think that if saddam tell me "hey kill your girlfriend or I'll kill 100 people", i really should say "what you do is in your hands". The problem is not the 100 people dying, people dies, the problem would be me killing somebody, I'm nobody to decide who live and who dies, the only thing I can do is not to kill, that's it.
2006-11-04
23:16:40 ·
update #3