2006-11-04 22:25:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
That along with their own short comings... They controlled both sides of the aisle for a good number of years... plenty enough time to accomplish something noteworthy... This, without much to show for it except talk... They earn excellent points for saying one thing and not doing a darn thing... The good of the country has been in the "park" position for almost 10 years now because of them...
2006-11-04 23:19:13 · answer #1 · answered by deakjone 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How many innocent civilians will die in terror attacks here after the Dems cut & run from the middle east would be a better question.
Thanks to http://usawakeup.org
In WWII Hitler's leadership convinced the Neutral German People to
kill 6,000,000 Jews,
kill 6,000,000 Christians,
and kill 7,000 Polish people.
His leadership convinced the Neutral German People the Jews were responsible for Germany's economic problems.
If Hitler could create such carnage with his leadership, just imagine what USAma bin Laden's leadership can do with 23% of the entire world's population of Neutral Muslims, armed with human bombers and 21st Century Chemical ,Biological and Nuclear Weapons.
The root of Bin Laden's leadership is based upon the entire Muslim religion being totally dysfunctional, by any standard of modern culture. Consequently, the dysfunctional fringe can be recruited as terrorist bombers to resolve their 1,400 years of shackled freedom.
Now, if there is a worldwide Economic collapse – which is highly probable - rendering the disenfranchised Muslims becoming even more isolated and culturally deprived, Bin Laden will have an even more willing Neutral Muslim population to recruit new bombers to help destroy Western Civilization.
And for icing on the cake, hundreds of millions of dollars of Middle East oil money will continue to fund the terrorists who are recruited. This means that large sums of money will continue to go to the families of martyred terrorists, thereby facilitating family approval of this inhuman cultural cancer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
Winston Churchill
2006-11-05 06:35:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Laugh now, cause Wednesday morning you'll still be crying about stolen elections!
You need Issues to run on, Hate won't win election...
Silly Libs you haven't learned yet!
2006-11-05 07:07:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how many people they invite to their victory parties.
2006-11-05 06:34:28 · answer #4 · answered by Namtrac 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully all of those who did not stand with us while they were shredding our constitution and making the rich richer at the expense of all of us non-billionaires.
2006-11-05 06:30:56 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus H. Zeitgeist 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Dems are winning
2006-11-05 06:38:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully plenty of them.
2006-11-05 06:36:35 · answer #7 · answered by P P 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
r
2006-11-05 08:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I am not a clairvoyant.
2006-11-05 06:34:57 · answer #9 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hopefully all of them
2006-11-05 06:34:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋