Does The Loch Ness Monster exist? I mean, nobody has ever found any proof, but she could exist. She could be related to dinosaurs! I mean, I have read ways she could exist, like how she has been here so long. So, is she real?
2006-11-04 21:12:47 · 15 answers · asked by Rachel M 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
Also, some ppl wonder why when they scan with radar, they never see her. And besides, nobody knows the real size of her. And yes her, lots of ppl call her a her. Maybe there is a cave, cove, or tunnel leading somewhere to another body of water. Nobody knows her size because one, the sergan had a photo of a small version of his trunk, which was a hoax. Exactly. If we believed it was that size, and found out the photo wasn't real, it could be any size. And once I saw a clear video. It wasn't fuzzy, and somebody couldn't have edited it. It was way too clear and there were no messups. Anyways, it showed some ppl on a boat and then the boat rocked really hard, and then a little hump appeared out of the top of the water and went back under. I can't remember where I saw it tho! I think it was YouTube.
2006-11-04 21:30:55 · update #1
No it does not exist. For it to exist, there has to be more than one. No-one has found bones, skin, eggs, dead fish with teeth marks or foot or fin prints, you'd have thought that after all this time, something would have washed up onto the shores. All we have are fuzzy photos, most of which take an expert thirty seconds to dismiss as forgeries. I notice you are calling it a female. Why? Probably for the same reason that this myth has not died down. The people of Loch Ness have humanised this creature and made it a lovable and friendly female that everyone can relate to. Not that there's anything wrong with that, I think it is a valid tourist drawcard, which introduces people to the beautiful countrysides and hills of Scotland.
About the only thing more mysterious than "Nessie" in Scotland is how Haggis can become a national dish.
It was a brave Scot who first stuffed a sheeps stomach with other inedibles, cooked it, and thought - "I think I'll eat that".
2006-11-04 21:57:53 · answer #1 · answered by Labsci 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anything is possible. People who scoff at the existance of something they can't readily perceive are very closed-minded and arrogant.
Loch Ness is massive and extremely deep. A lot of animal and plant life could exist in there that we've never seen before. Take the Coelacanth as an example...a fish officially declared extinct since the stone ages. Guess what happened during the 20th century? One got caught off the coast of Madagascar, and others have been caught since! What? Science was wrong?! Perish the thought.
Contrary to popular belief, we know about one octillianth of everything that there is to know. There's a lot out there on our own planet that we haven't found yet. Including Nessie...if she exists. And she (or they) easily could.
2006-11-05 05:20:17 · answer #2 · answered by ardra71 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I remember sometime last year the people that took the famous Loch Ness Monster photo from long ago confessed to it being a hoax. Even though, I still think that it could be a possibilty, like Bigfoot, I think there are too many sightings for it not to be real.
2006-11-05 05:41:37 · answer #3 · answered by merraou 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The true answer is should we believe what we are told but the people who scan that lake. There are some very deep and long caverns in the mountains that are under that lake and no one really know how far or where they extend to. Also it is strange that some of these caverns are not public knowledge........ Also in some of these caverns they can put in a three story building with room to spare. I for one do not believe that we are being told the whole truth about Loch Ness Monster. Also i strongly believe that nessy does exist...............................
2006-11-05 12:14:16 · answer #4 · answered by kilroymaster 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as I'd like to believe in Nessie, I have to admit that I don't. She would have to have really evolved to evade the ways man has used to 'find' her all these years. It's a great story and follows the Lake Champlain creature. With today's technology and our quests to put everything under a microscope, she would all ready be dead. Sorry. And yes, I hate that we can't just leave some things alone. Especially what's possibly the only survivor of a species.
2006-11-05 13:32:17 · answer #5 · answered by swarr2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Answer = NO
Though the loch is quite deep and very long, it is too small to support an animal the size of a whale.
The monster would eat all of the fish in it quite quickly and would soon starve to death, or be forced to move on.
2006-11-05 05:17:39 · answer #6 · answered by Mike C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course she exists i was there on holiday once, was having a beer one night when it got dark down by the loch. Nessie got out and played the bagpipes for me. we spent all night together, we laughed and laughed................
2006-11-05 05:43:56 · answer #7 · answered by sharon w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no reason why not? It's a cool idea, I mean it could be a decendant of dinosaurs!
2006-11-05 05:14:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be impossible for a creature to live that long without offpring, any one would concur that life does not stand still
2006-11-05 14:21:56 · answer #9 · answered by josem0808 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People say it is real, but i cant say theres any real evidence to prove this....i suppose it's nice to think it does.
2006-11-05 05:15:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋