yes both sexually and the general self being..........
2006-11-04 21:03:56 · 15 answers · asked by evets 2 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
While not medically needed and done more for religious or family tradition circumcision is slowly losing popularity. Personally I prefer a circumcised man but to each his own, it is certainly not a life or death situation.
2006-11-04 21:14:24 · answer #1 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When I was pregnant with my first child I had a difference of opinion with my then husband as to the baby being circumcised. He was for, I was against.
I went to my gynaecologist for support. He told me to go back to said husband and give him this definition of circumcision:
"An unnecessary operation performed on an unconsenting minor without anaesthetic."
I fail to see how it can determine manhood either sexually or with general well being.
Incidentally I know a guy who was circumcised as an adult, due to having a very tight foreskin. He said he was one of the few men who could give an accurate answer as to which was better. He said that uncircumcised was definitely more sensitive but the trade off was that when circumcised the lowered sensitivity meant he could last longer. So there you go, the old dilemma - quality or quantity?
2006-11-04 23:29:16 · answer #2 · answered by Sue 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How you act determines manhood.
It is healthier for males to be circumsized as the foreskin if not properly cleaned can grow bacteria and result in more infections for the man's partner. It is also more attractive in my opinion.
BUt circumcision has nothing to do with manhood in any way. Not in America anyway.
2006-11-04 21:27:10 · answer #3 · answered by Mary N 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, for three reasons:
1 > There are obviously lots of men, and manly men at that, who are not circumcised. (I'm circumcised, myself, but I had no say in the matter, which brings us to...)
2 > Many boys are circumcised shortly after birth. They are obviously not yet men.
3 > Unfortunately, in some cultures girls are circumcised as well, by removing the clitoris. Men can argue all they want about whether uncircumcised men have more feeling down there, but these poor women have it all over them for loss of feeling, if they're lucky enough not to die in the process.
Yahoo Answers rules prevent me from voicing my opinion of you.
2006-11-04 21:13:02 · answer #4 · answered by John's Secret Identity™ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2006-11-04 21:05:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
that is in basic terms cultural obviously. That and herd-mentality. be conscious everyone who's adverse to lady circumcision claims all kinds of undesirable issues about it- ladies won't be able to in any respect have excitement, they'll be in discomfort for existence, there are nob advantages, and on and on. None of that are authentic obviously. yet they have been informed those products, and we do not decrease women human beings, so as that they might want to be authentic. on the otherhand, they in basic terms list positives about male circumcision- prevents ailment, doesn't result sexual excitement, must be father and mom decision, uncut penises are gross and so on and so on. None of it really is authentic, or is punctiliously subjective. yet considering that we do it, there might want to be a good reason. Afterall, 50% of yankee mom's can't be incorrect, can they? the actuality is, human beings can locate techniques to justify all kinds of atrocities in the adventure that they quite want too. Slavery, afterall, became considered positive to all in contact at one aspect besides. If all ofthese answerers would do a touch study into both subject matters, they might see that MGM is way more effective horriffic than they ever idea, and that FGM isn't almost as terrible as they are making it out to be. in this u . s . a . women human beings opt for to get circumcised. Its referred to as "beauty gynecology" and "hoodectomy" or "labiaplasty". Its an suggested opt for that grown women human beings make about there own bodies. Boys deserve an same- to be left on my own till they can make their own decision. -Neb playstation - I quite a lot forgot- peo-ple say FGM is undesirable because it really is done in unhygenic situations- yet they might nonetheless oppose it if done in a docs place of work, so the argument is moot. besides that, MANY more effective boys than women are circumcised in airborne dirt and dust huts with rusty razors everywhere in the globe in line with annum! maximum tribes that circumcise ladies also circumcise men, yet there are thousands more effective who in basic terms circumcise men.
2016-11-28 19:20:42 · answer #6 · answered by gagliano 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, although in some cultures it is a rite of passage to becoming a "man" within that culture.
2006-11-04 21:30:01 · answer #7 · answered by camsean73 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In your case, I say it does. Apparently they took a little too much off.
2006-11-04 21:05:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depends on your sexual confidence and social empathy.
2006-11-04 21:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by DrunkenDialer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but they do say that the penis is more sensitive if NOT circumcised.
2006-11-04 21:12:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋