It failed because it had no agenda so far as Indian interest was concerned. The Muslims were trying to regain power with Hindu support from the English traders, but the Hindus of Hindusthan would have continued to be under rule of invaders. It was a choice between two evils so far as native Indian Hindus were concerned. Its failure was, hence, a historical inevitability.
2006-11-05 04:03:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There were two groups of Filipinos revolting against the Spanish: the Propaganda/Propagandistas, who used their writing; and the KKK/Katipuneros who used violence. The reasons why the propaganda failed: 1. They weren't united 2. They had limited, if any, funds. The rich who used to support them stopped sending money the reasons why the KKK failed: 1. Not enough weapons 2. Someone told the Fraile (the priests) about the KKK 3. Their leaders were caught and arrested And the Gomburzas (Gomez, Burgos, Zamora). Zamora was innocent. They were after "Jose" Zamora, not Jacinto (the one who was killed) and there was a big misunderstanding with a gambling invitation he received.
2016-05-22 00:37:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well.....the main cause of the failure was the revolt was not properly organized against organized and disciplined army of british who were strong in warfare activities more accurately than those of freedom fighters......and there was also the conflict of "Who is Super to Whom?" attitude among involved princes.
2006-11-04 20:47:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by indraraj22 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and yes. And also, lack of planning, logistics, follow-through, discipline, etc.
But mostly, it was because the British morale went way up after telling that old joke a hundred times:
"I say Old Thing," said the Colour-Sergeant. "The Indian Peasants are Revolting!"
"Yes, they are, and we've all known it for years," said the young Leftenant. "But don't let on, they'll feel slighted, you know."
2006-11-04 20:36:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Longshiren 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
reasons for the failure:
1. the revolt was not centralized.
2. the leader (Zafar) was not as strong as he should have been
3. the various leaders fought for themselves and not for the nation
4. the british had advanced weapons as opposed to our swords
5. the revolt started earlier than it was supposed to be
6. there was no unity among the various maratha chiefs like gaekwad, bhosle etc.
2006-11-05 00:27:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by theallknowingguy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
reasons:
1- Localisation
2- British had Control Over sea
3- Indifferent attitude between chiefs of rebels
4- British had latest weapons
5- British had great commanders
6- Rebels had no plans for future
7- Rebels had no great commanders
2006-11-04 20:34:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Talha Haroon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋