2006-11-04 17:06:06 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Seriously mentally ill is my impression. Only another sociopath would take them both seriously.
2006-11-04 18:26:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 14⤊ 3⤋
Franken is a comedian and says as much...to me it's like watching him on Saturday Night Live in the old days. Rush is a serious pundit...Franken is a part timer. however, much of Limbaugh's stuff is formed around supporting an issue or position and not finding the truth or the moral ground...Franken is at least concerned with factual information however much he twists it to his point of view...Rush is a hypocritical blowhard, Franken is a comedian who finds that most of the world is full of crap...stranded on a island with both of them, I'd conspire against Rush so that Franken and I could get some protein in our diet.
2006-11-04 17:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Al Franken is an obvious comedian doing political comedy.
Rush Limbaugh is an obvious political hater doing drugs.
2006-11-04 17:30:25 · answer #3 · answered by Terry 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Both are very good entertainers. They say things they often don't beleve thierself to upset callers and get people to call in to rant and rave and make fools of thierself.
Most likely If Rush had thought he could have made more money being a Liberal, he would have been a Liberal.
I doubt he really beleives half of what he talks about, He gets rich making people hate him and call in.
Al Franken, I am not sure if he actually beleives all of the .... he talks every day. ( yes I listen to both of them) He seems to have more of a real agenda, but again, he is there to upset you and to rock your opinions.
2006-11-04 17:27:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i think of they're the two way off. If I had to p.c.. i might p.c.. Rush yet even his ideas etc are to far ideal for me and that i'm a Conservative, however extra midsection of the line than maximum.
2016-10-21 07:08:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Franken is entertaining and his statements reflect thought, he is a Liberal. Limp-blimp is as opposite as you can get, not entertaining, rather insulting to anyone of average or better intelligence, thoughtless, reactionary and he fabricates his statistics.
2006-11-04 17:32:16 · answer #6 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. I think Don King needs to promote a jello fight between the two idiots. Of course Franken would probably be a no show, and if he did show up, Limbaugh would lose all sense of reality and end up eating Franken, thinking he was in fact a large liberal jello monster.
2006-11-04 17:11:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
the only difference between the two is Franken has a better sense of humor...
that's about it... anyone who takes them seriously is probably quite the joke themselves...
2006-11-04 17:28:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Franken was on SNL, remember Stuart Smalley? How could I after that, he's good enough, smart enough, ect....
Limbaugh, well some what, but not totaly. like EIB...thats a joke.
2006-11-04 17:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by A dude 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Divide and conquer... the extreme factions of both parties are the activists of the each side. They ridicule the opposite side with humorous cut down to emotionally rallies their base and to secure just enough of the middle to secure power.
Once they secure power, they have to pay back the activists and lobbyist who paid for the campaign with your money. The middle has to wake up and move politics back to a formal debate of ideas instead of a matter of image with no substance. So no one should either take these two seriously.
2006-11-04 17:16:06 · answer #10 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I've never listened to Franken. I've listened to Rush but don't like him. Mostly wind.
2006-11-04 17:11:35 · answer #11 · answered by notme 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋