Evangelitical leader steps down in shame!! How many more conservative leaders have to show their true colors before their followers realize they are being lied to?
2006-11-04 17:03:06 · 8 answers · asked by Gettin_by 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In the closet? Meaning what?
I don't think it is fair to judge an entire group of people based on a few.
2006-11-04 17:04:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I didn't even hear them while they were doing the lying. The first I heard about these nuts was on CNN. All the conservative leaders I know are doing a great job and have been able to stand up to those who were calling them liars and prove them wrong.
2006-11-04 17:08:55 · answer #2 · answered by greeiore 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Uh. Sexual preference has nothing to do with ideological preferences and politics.
As for Evangelical leaders being phonies -- so what? They all are! The world isn't 6,004 years old, we don't have guardian angels, good, clean-living Christian people die every day of cancer, and the universe is 13 billion years old.
Evangelical leaders survive by arousing hysteria. They are paid to arouse people. Of course, on their own time, they want to get paid back. Haggard has told his church he was ONLY receiving a massage. Merely. Maybe the holy spirit uplifted him?
2006-11-04 17:07:19 · answer #3 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
when the truth comes out the pervert is gotten rid of.It is not a matter of hiding in the closet it is a matter of getting rid of the liberal trash that sneaks in and tries to hide in our closet.
As for stepping down in shame I firmly believe he should have. This not unlike our liberal friends who uphold this type of behavior.Even to the point of being praised for it.
2006-11-04 17:12:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm not sure what's funnier ... that Haggard claims he paid for a massage but didn't have sex, or that he paid for meth, but didn't use it.
(To 'bottles':) Hey genius ... asker didn't say Haggard was a politician. He said "conservative leaders" ... I would say, as head of the National Association of Evangelicals, Haggard qualified.
2006-11-04 17:32:25 · answer #5 · answered by c_sense_101 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
So you're saying people should give up their values because two or three "Conservative leaders" have? What should they do, vote Democrat, so their beliefs are tossed aside more readily? Where is the logic in that?
2006-11-04 17:07:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Hey genius. . . Haggard is not a politician!! OKAY?
2006-11-04 17:06:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, and that is a harsh generalization!!!!
2006-11-04 17:06:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋