Any insight into that what came first chicken and egg thing?

Answer 1

The egg technically came first, as the chicken was probably an evolution from a sort of prehistoric ancestor. Plus, the egg was always there before the chicken. Dinosaurs laid them. The chicken was most likely born from an egg. Therefore, egg came first.

Answer 2

It does sound puzzling at first, but how much does one have to think until one realizes that both chicken and egg must necessarily have come from something that is neither a chicken nor an egg? This answer was knowable centuries before biology came about, yet people assumed there was some unsolvable mystery behind the issue.



The modern chicken is generally believed to be a descendant of "Archaeopteryx", the oldest known bird. This 150 million year old resident of the Jurassic period laid eggs, and at some point of time, evolved into an animal that was one generation away from being a proper chicken.



"The egg came first.


DNA mutations occur in the early stages of life of organisms. As you know, when new cells divide, the DNA within the nucleus separates nucleotides and duplicates, then two new helix are formed. The amino acids responsible for mitosis are prone to make mistakes to the genetic architecture-- a beautiful system of flaws that cause evolution and diversity in species. It's like the reason why children will look like their parents, but not approximately, they are a combination of both parent's ancestor genetic history and the result of new combinations in the DNA helix.


So according to fossil research, before the chicken was the "proto-chicken" and this bird was almost chicken, but not quite. Well this proto-chicken laid an egg with a mutation, and the interior change of the DNA was enough that the exterior of the new bird could be thought of as a new species.

Answer 3

The answer to this question depends on what kind of person you are.

If you are a religious person, you would believe that the chicken came first becuase in the Bible it says that God created "animals" and not mere eggs.

If you are believe in science more than you do religion, then you would probably believe that the egg came first becuase it follows with the rules of science that eveything evolves from something (thus the chicken cannot simply come into existence as is).

Personally, I don't really know what came first and I am quite content without knowing. This is so becuase questions like "chicken or egg" make the world a more interesting place to live in.

Imagine if you knew everything about everything... how boring that would be. Mystery adds spice to life.

Answer 4

The egg came first.
The first chicken came from the first chicken egg that was formed though evolution. You can't have the chicken come out of nowhere, it's commen sense. You CAN have the egg before the chicken. It's NOT possible the other way around.

Answer 5

In nature, living things evolve through changes in their DNA. In an animal like a chicken, DNA from a male sperm cell and a female ovum meet and combine to form a zygote -- the first cell of a new baby chicken. This first cell divides innumerable times to form all of the cells of the complete animal. In any animal, every cell contains exactly the same DNA, and that DNA comes from the zygote.

Chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote. These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutation(s) that produced the first true chicken. That one zygote cell divided to produce the first true chicken.

Prior to that first true chicken zygote, there were only non-chickens. The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg. So, the egg must have come first.

Answer 6

the considered evolution states that species exchange over the years by skill of mutation and sexual duplicate. thinking deoxyribonucleic acid might properly get replaced relatively until ultimately now start up, this is argued that a mutation ought to have taken place at concept or indoors an egg such that a creature such as a fowl, yet no longer a fowl, laid the 1st fowl eggs. those eggs then hatched into chickens that inbred to grant a residing inhabitants.consequently, in this uncomplicated, the two the fowl and the kind of its egg superior concurrently from birds that, mutually as no longer of the comparable precise species, progressively grew to grow to be extra and extra like recent-day chickens over the years.

Answer 7

Well did you ever hear of an egg rolling down the ramp of Noah's Ark after the flood? It was two chickens walking 2 by 2. Do you need an answer about the pig and the bacon, or do you get the idea? LOL

Answer 8

Wouldn't a persons answer reflect their belief in evolution or creation.
Since I believe in creation I say the Chicken came first.
But I would think those of evolution would say the egg.

Answer 9

My best guess is that the egg came first. All life has to go through a cycle which involves birth, experience, and death. If a chicken appeared out of nowhere it wouldn't adhere to this basic principle.

Answer 10

teh answer is obvious. the chicken. the chicken came first because it had to be created in order to lay the egg. now if you are just talking about a chicken or an egg (not a chicken gg) then teh egg because dinosaurs came before chickens and they laid eggs.