I strongly urge that everyone watch " Obsession-The Threat from Radical Islam ". It's a new documentary. It was featured on Fox tonight. They did 1 hour of interviews and film-clips from the new movie. Before anyone jumps to conclusions, Fox didn't produce it. It was the product of an independent. And there was no room for commentary. It was film footage from Al Queda, Palestinian TV, Iranian TV, Al Jazeera and others. Nothing to 'make-up' nothing to 'twist' or 'spin'. Shocking !!!!!!!! Get ready to 'pick your jaw off of the floor'.
2006-11-04
15:24:07
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
How far am I willing to go? Well I WENT so far as to 'join the Army in 1981 to fight Iranian Terrorists that had kidnapped and held American Hostages' . that's how Far I'm willing to go.
2006-11-04
15:33:59 ·
update #1
Anyone who hasn't seen 100's of examples of this, just isn't on Y/A very much at all. It happens many times within the same question !!!! And the rest of the democrats here, know it.
2006-11-04
15:39:46 ·
update #2
The terrorists have been 'hellbent' on destroying us for more than 30 years. They have gradually gotten better and better. This is not something to joke or arfue about. This goes beyond our 'political' differences.
2006-11-04
15:42:08 ·
update #3
You have no 'rights' or 'freedoms' if your dead. We must stop them. And where the heck is your ANSWER to the QUESTION?????
2006-11-04
15:44:53 ·
update #4
We realize there are terrorists in the world. We aren't willing to live in prison to avoid them.
We spend more than the rest of the world combined on defense. How far are you willing to go?
2006-11-04 15:27:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by imnogeniusbutt 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
Because the poor dears have no platform and they hate that .
9/11 is a "conspiracy" to them.
John Kerry, their treasonous "hero" is the best they could do in '04 .
The 4% unemployment rate is the best the U.S. has ever seen-yet it makes democrats angry , because a Republican is in office with a 4% unemployment rate ; sooo democrats start "Blaming "McDonald's for the unemployment rate . I actually had democrat responses to the 4% unemployment rate -as tho it were a venereal disease . When ever they get caught in their illegal or treasonous antics - it's a vast right-wing conspiracy ; but they are the king of conspiracy -with everything from 9/11 to a hurricane . Democrats can see events unfold before their eyes but if they didn't invent it -it didn't exist .
2006-11-04 16:58:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The real fear-mongering is the idea that the right wing puts forward that we have to give up our freedom and rights in order to fight the terrorists. Democrats want eavesdropping for example, they just want it done legally with warrants which can be obtained up to a week or so after the eavesdropping has commenced.
What is the point of defeating the terrorists if we ourselves destroy the very things that make America great in order to "win"?
2006-11-04 16:07:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by ash 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
i think terrorism to be between the main intense matters dealing with us immediately, if no longer the main intense. in spite of the undeniable fact that, I do have faith that some Republicans (in particular Bush) use terrorism to attempt and scare the yank human beings into balloting for Republicans. I fairly doubt that maximum democratic party leaders easily need to overlook appropriate to the difficulty of terrorism. regardless of what many human beings have faith the two events have sensible human beings. additionally, the two events comprehend if yet another attack happens on their watch they are going to be killed interior the subsequent elections. i think of democrats might take care of issues in any different case. the difficulty with Democrats is they do no longer come out and state what they might do to advance the area. who's fault replaced into 9/11? Hmm, i do no longer understand, perchance it replaced into the TERRORISTS! perchance Clinton would have completed extra to combat terrorists. perchance a number of Bush's team handed over warning indications. yet from time to time undesirable human beings do undesirable issues and no one guy or woman would be held in charge. in case you somewhat have faith that basically Republicans % u . s . to be risk-free, then you definately at the instant are not almost as sensible as i thought you have been. perchance you will desire to attempt questioning for your self and not stick to each word that comes out of Rush Limbaugh and Presidents Bush's mouth.
2016-10-21 07:03:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their attitude is very dangerous. What better aid to the enemy than to deny their existence? It is a good as being invisible. Same thing happened before WWII though and history is bout to repeat itself all over again. BTW the information that was in the movie Obsession has been out there for a long time. One of the speakers "Walid Shoebat" wrote the book "Why I left Jihad" http://www.shoebat.com/
The Lady Nonie Darwish wrote "Now they call me infidel".
I was not surprised by any of it. I have been following those clowns since the late 70's. People are only paying attention now because of 9/11
2006-11-04 15:45:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by scarlettt_ohara 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I've never heard a Democrat say that. I've heard right-wing radio show hosts accuse them of saying it, but I've never heard it from an actual Dem. The Democratic party understands that there is a threat from Islamic terrorists. They just think that the Bush White House has done a poor job. By starting a war in Iraq and letting Osama escape, nothing of any substance has been done. There is a threat, but the Republicans play on our fears for political gain. They don't want Americans to feel safe. They think that if we're scared, we'll vote Republican.
2006-11-04 15:36:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jogong 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Because everyone in the WORLD knows they are weak on defense. So if terrorism is real they cannot possibly handle the job of running this country. Look what Clinton did to the military while he was in office even though there were attacks on US interests around the world. He did not take them seriously. They continue to ignore it like it doesn't exist.
2006-11-04 15:32:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
no one i know says there's no such thing as terrorism but you can not wage conventional war on guerrilla tactics. the war on Iraq has absolutely nothing to do with stopping terrorism. it is in fact, according to GW Bush's own intelligence agencies, acerbating the problem.
and since GW has shredded the Constitution and totally undermined the basis for our rule of law the terrorists have won. the Bush admin has done more damage to our rights and freedoms and our identity as a nation than Osama could do in 10 evil lifetimes.
PS. hey Cinner? the Republicans have been in total power for 6 years now. the "but but Clinton" routine is wearing pretty thin. dontcha think? oh and ... please try to keep in mind the 9/11 happened on BUSH'S WATCH and he and his staff had plenty of warning but held no meetings concerning terrorism for 8 MONTHS after Bush was installed in the Whitehouse despite pleas from Clinton's former security adviser.
PPS. hey bottle? "Give me Liberty or give me death".
and i did answer your question. i rebutted that your question is even based on a valid assumption.
2006-11-04 15:39:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by nebtet 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
how many nations in this world support terrorists,alqueda?lets give an example of say 60 nations,are you willing to go to war with 60 nations?since bush has no foreign policy what other alternative is there?and why are all these terrorists so hellbent on destroying america?and please i dont wanna hear because they hate freedom so much, that phrase has been over used!
2006-11-04 15:34:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
The smoke screen theories again they would like you to believe that there is no threat or it's not as bad as we think or they can talk us out of it all three are a load of puss as you well know they will get everybody killed i hope the terrorist start with them!
2006-11-04 15:28:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by no one here gets out alive 6
·
4⤊
3⤋