Have you ever seen any movie, or video in which it had excerpts from terrorists? I just watched one (Obsession). For a while I thought the other conservatives were calling you guys terrorists, just because they didn't agree with you. But, when I was watching it, I hear a lot of the same things from the terrorists as you guys. The terrorists call Bush the devil, and you guys call him the anti-christ.
Do you guys know anything about terrorism?
2006-11-04 13:09:00 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey Dash, good one. I was thinking about asking you guys if you knew anything at all. But that would be a rhetorical question
2006-11-04 13:12:59 · update #1
Hey "g", your right, I am not an expert, but then again, I never said I was. But, I have taken the effort to become one, too bad you guys (dstr, notme, and that girl) have not. Maybe you would learn something, but then again, that is another oxymoron I have seen from you guys
2006-11-04 13:16:20 · update #2
no coreyander, you are wrong trust me. I know about that psychological principle. Its not that simple. I mean, do you actually know anything about the nazis? do you know anything about the terrorists? So relating things is not allowed? So bush can not be the anti-christ? I don't get you libs, maybe one reason I have a court order that all libs must stay 1200 feet away from me
2006-11-04 13:22:21 · update #3
coreyland, now that I re-read my question, and your answer, I notice that you display a psychological principle of being scared of the truth.(that is laments terms). You tried to make up some excuse on why such can not be true. I mean look at my question!!! I didn't accuse you guys of anything, but you all seem to have been offended somehow. Why is that? Because maybe some of your beliefs just might be wrong. Grow up, do some research of your own and see who is right
2006-11-04 13:26:27 · update #4
"g", Iraq does have to do with Terror!!!! Don't you guys notice anything???? Ok, Bush made the stupid mistake of de-classifying Saddam's plans on how to build a nuclear weapon. Ok, Saddam was allowing terrorist camps in his country. Why??? hmmmm.... and why did Osama say after the US invaded Iraq that the terrorists could not lose the war in Iraq? I don't get you guys. Are you guys that forgetful?
2006-11-04 13:28:50 · update #5
Ok, "g", now you are starting to sound insane. The funniest part about this entire question, is that I did not accuse libs of being terrorists.
I just told them the reason why others do
I think you guys are a little insecure about the information I have brought forth. Just research it to see if I am lying
2006-11-04 13:36:29 · update #6
"g", why has not having the word "official" never stopped you guys from believing something?
2006-11-04 13:39:07 · update #7
I don't know why, but then again, that man is not the greatest, and I know such. But then "g" why the heck else would we invade Iraq? Please don't say oil. Oh, and I was talking about terrorism to begin with, how the heck did this get to Iraq? Oh, they are connected, that's how
2006-11-04 13:44:47 · update #8
coreyandy, you got to be kidding me! That line, was the truth! I noticed such. I never said I believe such. Sorry, I don't know what you mean by stating an observation, I did not interpret it, but rather you guys did. Yes, it may have implyed that. "you guys" so what if I put that? Do you prefer libbies some more? libbies seem to say a lot of the things that terrorists do. Does that sound better?
2006-11-04 13:49:57 · update #9
Ha ha! I just read this question because it sounded funny, im not a "libbie" (i like that nickname) but I have teachers who refuse to listen to logical explanations on how their beliefs and terrorists are almost identical: Jesus must be wiped clean from the U.S., Bush must be persecuted at all costs, ect. ect.
2006-11-04 13:15:39 · answer #1 · answered by Yalerower 2 · 6⤊ 4⤋
oh clearly not, but after watching one video you're clearly an expert...
so, what do you know about terrorism? teach us?
at least I know the difference between Osama and Saddam... I'm starting to wonder about you guys...
you're making an attempt... by watching a movie... have you read the 9-11 reports.. how about starting there...
if so we can talk about why our main battle front in the "war on terror" is in a place that had basically nothing to do with 9-11?
and why is Osama still running free?
HAHAHA... first off... the reports of those camps are disputed... and there are also reports that Saddam saw them as a threat and was wanting to take them out...
it's VERY second hand information, from all the reports that I've seen... very soft...
second... hmm... maybe Osama knows that if he says "this war is key" that every Republican in America will demand we stay there for 50 years... that way he can pretty much do WHATEVER HE WANTS IN THE MEANTIME...
and I'm not even that familiar with his plans... how far along he was or how far off...certianly not nearly as far as iran or n. korea...
BASICALLY... Saddams links are far from OFFICIAL... and they are about as confirmed as WMD reports, from what I've heard..
and Bush and the 9-11 report said that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11... and personally... I want to deal with those that DID HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH 9-11...
YOU'RE IGNORING ALL THESE COUNTRIES WITH HUGE BLATANT 9-11 LINKS for Iraq that has the little disputed links to some terrorists somewhere?
EDIT:
I have researched it... and if you ever researched both sides of the issue.. you see that they are shaky as H*ll... why would Bush say the Iraq was wasn't about terror, if Iraq had all these blatant terror links?
EDIT: the only reason bush gave for going to iraq was WMD... beyond that... you've got me... maybe they have some super iron clad evidence they haven't released yet, and frankly I hope they do.. then all this won't be for nothing...
2006-11-04 21:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
You are falling into a fairly common logical (not psychological, logical - as in inductivist logic) fallacy called the association fallacy. It is often phrased this way:
"Adolf Hitler was a vegetarian. Adolf Hitler was evil. Therefore, other people who practive vegetarianism must be evil or "Hitler-like."
In your case, you could say "Terrorists hate George W. Bush. Terrorists are evil. Therefore, other people who hate George W. Bush are evil or "terrorist-like".
Unfortunately, for you, this is shoddy logic and won't get you far in an academic debate.
PS: Actually, your question says "I hear a lot of the same things from the terrorists as you guys" and you implicitly take that as support for the pseudo-conservative position that liberals can be equated with terrorists. That is an example of the association fallacy. If you think I'm avoiding the truth, I think you are demonstrating some projection. But what should I expect from someone who considers "you guys" to be a valid unit of analysis?
2006-11-04 21:17:59 · answer #3 · answered by coreyander 3 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Man I got to hire you for my show.
If you believe the crap your spewing you"ll buy what I'm selling in a heartbeat. You seam sincere too.
I especially like the one about Saddam allowing terrorist camps in his country. I gotta use that on the show.
2006-11-04 22:02:11 · answer #4 · answered by Truth Erector 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You know, when we said you all had a love fest going, we had no idea you really had a love fest going.
Invite a few more pages over and spike the punch, blame Bill Clinton, it will be all right.
You leader spent 7 freaking minutes in utter fear after he was told we were under attack. The man was a coward during Viet Nam, and a Coward at 9-11, and a coward today!
2006-11-04 21:18:57 · answer #5 · answered by Russ C 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I hope you are not saying that this was news to you that liberals think like terrorists. I came across this poll a couple of days ago on Aljazeera (Bin Ladin's favorite network). Check it out and see if the answers are not strikingly familiar.
2006-11-04 21:38:46 · answer #6 · answered by FabMom 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
you hace to believe in christ for there to be an anti-christ
no bush is just a idiot who has too many people trying to control him.
2006-11-04 22:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Lexi 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you know anything about honesty?
EDIT: or respect? Do you actually do research that is not from a CON blog? Bush is not the devil. He is not the anti-Christ. And he is definitely not a good leader. He is however THE GREAT DIVIDER. He will be remembered for destroying a part of our country during it's time of need, and taking more than his share of POWER and abusing it. Thanks, Bush! (rolling eyes)
2006-11-04 21:11:42 · answer #8 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
I consider Bush to be a facilitator of terrorism and you would too..but you lack the maturity to understand this.
2006-11-04 21:13:23 · answer #9 · answered by dstr 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
What you just said is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me GOD!!!!!!!!!! Everyone should see the movie: http://www.obsessionthe movie.com and they'll know who the terrorists are and what they want to do to all Americans and the USA and the rest of the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-04 21:32:45 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋