What are "podcasts" used for?

Question

What type of programs do they have? Are they mainly news, or entertainment, or random stuff that anyone that's bored wants to post?

Any answer would be great.

Answer 1

They are pretty much everything and anything. Some are serious commercial programming, others are serious hobbyist, and most/many are just individuals with something to say.

>>Podcasting, created by former MTV VJ Adam Curry, is a term that was devised as a crisp way to describe the technology used to push audio content from websites down to consumers of that content, who typically listen to it on their iPod (hence the "pod") or other audio player that supports mp3 at their convenience. The term podcasting is meant to rhyme with broadcasting and is a derivative of the iPod platform. While not directly associated with Apples iPod device or iTunes music service, the company did contribute both the desire and the technology for this capability. Podcasting is not unlike time-shifted video software and devices like TiVo, which let you watch what you want when you want by recording and storing video, except that podcasting is used for audio and is currently free of charge. Note, however, that this technology can be used to push any kind of file, including software updates, pictures, and videos.

Answer 2

dropping the call of atheist had no longer something to do with morality or immorality or scientific "miracles" or something like that. First, "atheist" is an unsatisfying identity. that's detrimental, and it in basic terms pertains to disbelief in one proposition. as a result, that's shallow. So I dropped it, and went on a quest to decide on what I did have self belief. That led me at last to the certainty that God is subjective, no longer objective. there became no desire for objective data to any extent further than there became desire for objective data that my renowned style of ice cream particularly is the main suitable interior the worldwide. I many times do no longer point out that i'm a former atheist with the aid of fact explaining it in complete is principally greater difficulty than its properly worth, and so i do no longer engender that distrustful reaction you stated. yet now i'm noticing that if i do no longer talk up, some atheists make each variety of detrimental stereotypes and assumptions approximately former atheists. edit: No, it is incorrect. once I say "dropping the call of atheist" with the aid of fact of this i ended making use of it as an identifier, no longer that I at the instant went lower back to believing in deities, objective or in any different case. i did no longer like the be conscious (I felt that it became shallow and detrimental, as I reported). I used helpful words like "naturalist" or "humanist" at the instant after dropping "atheist"