The video in question is the Doubletree hotel video, which government watchdog (sometime propaganda outlet) Judicial Watch says has been promised to them on November 9th.
According to a CNN FOIA request of 2002, a nearby hotel's video DID DID DID capture the impact.
The Doubletree and a Sheraton Hotel are the only hotels within view of the pentagon crash site. The FBI says no Sheraton video exists.
But according to Jacqueline Maguire special agent, counterterrorism division, signed under penalty of perjury (28USCs/s1746) the..."Doubletree hotel video did NOT capture the impact"
So which is it to be? Does a hotel video capture the impact or doesn't it?
On NOV 9, maybe we will find out. Or maybe we will get another grainy, slow-framed video that shows nothing but an explosion.....and no Boeing jet to be found....just like at the crash site.
2006-11-04 12:35:32 · 12 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Tail assembly? What pictures are you looking at? Certainly not the photos available to the rest of the world.
2006-11-04 12:42:07 · update #1
Thats right "DSTR" It remains a mystery why the FBI confiscated the gas station and hotel security videos within minutes of the crash and why they did not release these videos for five years, given that they say they show nothing.
2006-11-04 12:50:11 · update #2
"RATBRAIN" If you saw a plane in that footage, you saw it with your imagination. THAT VIDEO SHOWS NO PLANE
2006-11-04 12:53:18 · update #3
Any one who as seen the photos that were supplied to to the media through various news outlets has to come to the sober conclusion that it was not a 737 airplane that hit the Pentagon.
What is disturbing is why did they hold on to these videos for so long? Were their video experts "enhancing" it at the Pentagon all this time?
2006-11-04 12:43:44 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It seems quite funny to me. Even with all of the glaring errors and outright fabrications we still have this "loose change" to pick up.
There were many Eye Witnesses to the impact of a commercial airliner, into the E ring of the Pentagon on 11 September, 2001. The Quote I saw with my own Two little eyes that said that the Plane flew toward the Pentagon on that date " like a cruise missle" was taken out of context by Loose Change, I watched the report live and the Man made himself Disturbingly clear. The plane actually did hit the Pentagon, I saw the engine nacelles, and the tail fin sitting in the gaping hole left by the destruction of the craft as it struck the side of the building. GET A LIFE AND MOVE ON.
Good luck and Good night.
2006-11-04 20:48:34 · answer #2 · answered by Democestes 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's interesting how blind people can be??? How can 4 planes burn beyond recognition when jet fuel only burns up to 1200 degrees? What happened to all the black boxes?? Did the fire burn them up too? What happened to the nose cone that is made of plutonium? Again, jet fuel only burns up to 1200 degrees. Did you know that a B-9 bomber hit the Empire State building and only the top 4 floors were destroyed? Plus, the building didn't fall....Imagine that!!! When they bombed the underground parking lot, why didn't the building fall then? People should watch the Loose Change documentary 1-2. It will definitely change your mind! It did mine, and I'm not one to buy into the conspiracy theory.
2006-11-04 21:06:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
people need to start looking at the obvious flaws in the official story and the fact that 3/4 of the terrorists planes hit their targets w/o any planes intercepting them. cave dwellers cant make norad stand down and where is the evidence of the pentagon strike and flight 93? some people just take what the government gives them and some people seek the truth. if you blindly believe government then you let down not only yourself but your country. research and get to the bottom of 9/11!
2006-11-07 04:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by Al B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, they can work wonders with computer graphics these days. But that still won't explain that tiny hole, no wreckage, and the tape they confiscated from the carry out. Can you say Missile? Hi tech lies, coming to a theater near you.
2006-11-04 20:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by flip4449 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I saw the footage released from the pentagon. I saw the plane in that footage. Big 747ish, could only see a big chunk of the nose.
2006-11-04 20:49:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why are you concerned? Plan on sitting in front of the TV, smoking doobies and eating corn chips while rewinding and watching over and over again, all the while laughing like beavis and butthead?
2006-11-04 21:01:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
By the time November 9th rolls around that tape will be mysteriously gone.
2006-11-04 20:54:16 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Gee, then what was that tail assembly sticking out of the building?
2006-11-04 20:37:44 · answer #9 · answered by justa 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
A picture can be a very, very dangerous thing...
BELIEVE ME....
<-----------
2006-11-04 20:49:34 · answer #10 · answered by Johnny Dumb Lately 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋