English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

It gave citizens the right to form militias, which were the forefathers of our present day national guard.

2006-11-04 12:24:32 · answer #1 · answered by Gerty 4 · 3 2

Truthfully, the importance of the amendment is related to the time it was written. In the revolution era, there was an uncertainty in everything and especially in the government. The amendment to the constitution was made to protect citizens from a dictatorship or opressive monarchy, and allowed the option of rebellion should the people stop supporting the government. Today, however, this would not apply because if the government wanted to opress us, the enormous army, navy, airforce, police force, coast guard etc. would beat us in a second compared to the citizen owned pistols. Now it is a matter of domestic self defense, not a governmental tool.

Overall, the importance was in the past, now it is a disputed danger and a right of the people.

2006-11-04 12:29:02 · answer #2 · answered by lionspear777 2 · 0 3

the 2d modification does 2 issues: It provides the government the splendid to have a armed forces and it provides persons the splendid to possess firearms. it incredibly is substantial using fact on the time of the progressive conflict between the 1st issues the British rulers tried to do replaced into to confiscated the armory of the colonial voters. Unarmed voters could be a lot much less complicated to regulate by capacity of an authoritarian government than armed voters. The lesson for immediately is the comparable. If the government ever succeeded in banning all inner maximum possession of firearms, they might have entire administration using fact they effectively administration the armed forces. a terror of each and every government is that the persons will rebellion and end their rule. loss of very own weapons makes it particularly no longer likely.

2016-10-21 06:50:05 · answer #3 · answered by connely 4 · 0 0

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This country was built by blood and sweat. Without a militia to secure the nation we would have been crushed by our neighbors long ago. Without the right to keep and bear arms, could you imagine the crime rate. Every criminal would have a gun and the government would end up overthrown if we didn't have the militia and the right to bear arms.

2006-11-04 14:01:51 · answer #4 · answered by me_laub 3 · 0 0

I can tell you what it meant during the Cold War Era, maybe it is still the same.

No one would dare to invade us, because not only would you face the Army but the armed citizens. Ever see the movie Red Dawn, that would be a good example. Even though I am no longer in the military as a citizen it is my duly to fight, I hope most of us still feel that way.

2006-11-04 12:28:01 · answer #5 · answered by tcmoosey 3 · 4 0

In my opinion, the 1st Amendment IS more Important to the USA than the 2nd amendment. Simply because the pen is mightier than the sword.

2006-11-04 12:23:45 · answer #6 · answered by janshouse justice for all 2 · 0 1

Thomas Jefferson , author of the Bill of Rights said that the people must be allowed to bear arms to protect themselves from their governement, which is why this ammendment has been trampled on because the governement doesnt want you to be protected , protection is their racket. Remember both the Nazi's and the communists outlawed guns.........

2006-11-04 18:51:04 · answer #7 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1 0

At the time it was passed, it was a safeguard against a rogue federal government, and perhaps against foreign invasion.

Today, these concepts are ridiculous. Anybody who thinks that an individual can arm himself sufficiently to stand up to federal firepower is smoking something. And anybody who thinks that a foreign invader who gets past our military will get stopped by some guy holed up in the basement with firearms is injecting.

Why some people still think the threat of "rogue governments" and "foreign invaders" is as big as the threat of "idiot gun owners", "disgruntled teenagers mad at being dissed at the prom", and "insane loners wanting to kill some Amish kids" is beyond me.

P.S. by "idiot gun owners" I don't mean that all gun owners are idiots. Most know what they're doing. I'm referring to certain morons who shouldn't be trusted with a can opener, much less a gun. The guy who shoots his gun in the air on July 4th ... the parent of that kid who found dad's gun and ammo in a kitchen drawer ... that guy who got drunk at a bar and pulled his gun over a pool table dispute ... that guy who shot his kid while cleaning it. It's *those* guys I'm more worried about than Castro storming the beach at Ft. Lauderdale.

2006-11-04 13:15:23 · answer #8 · answered by c_sense_101 2 · 0 2

For the protection against civil unrest, law and order in case of natural disaster, and in case of invasion.The right to bear arm and armed militia. Funny side light, Pres. Bush wanted the Shia militia disarmed, with the Shia surburb in destruction, Not in these United States!!, and best the US government doesn't interfere.

2006-11-04 12:32:01 · answer #9 · answered by longroad 5 · 0 1

It makes sure the Gov't doesn't get to big for it's britches...and the people can overthrow a gov't that is oppressing it's people....that's why the democrats want more and more gun control......they want to take over this nation and there would be no resistance.
An unarmed society is a compliant society.

2006-11-04 12:29:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

It is important because it allowed the government to be able to call up an army without having to provide weapons. The government changed its mind and now the amendment is used to support the possession of guns in order to murder.

2006-11-04 12:29:25 · answer #11 · answered by St N 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers