I invented a way to stop "dangerous" fuel admissions from being released into the atmosphere. The only problem is that it requires kitten. Now what do you want me to do?
2006-11-04 11:50:29 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
3 kittens for a 50 mile trip
2006-11-04 11:56:36 · update #1
by "requires" do you mean kills? or do the kittens just have to meow to make it go, no real harm done to them?
if you have to kill them... what kind of weird mad scientist workshop do you have to make that kind of discovery? hahaha
great... that old crazy lady down the street that has 50 cats will be a millionaire now
2006-11-04 12:01:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creating family-friendly neighborhoods, where people can walk or ride bikes, and work at meaningful jobs that don't pollute the environment, does not require any harm to kittens. In fact, as shown by Ithaca NY, famous for their community-based money coupons that promote the local economy, citizens have successfully implemented "no-kill" animal shelters run by dedicated staff who educate others how to achieve the same. So if anything, cooperative economics and progressive development goes hand in hand with animal and human rights, not against. Here kitty, kitty, kitty. Peace and Meow to you, too!
2006-11-04 20:09:13 · answer #2 · answered by emilynghiem 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One kitten for each user, one for each car, one kitten each time you start the car, or just one kitten, period? My answer would depend on the number of kittens used.
2006-11-04 19:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by DavidNH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seems like to me, that is the waste of to many kittens.
2006-11-04 19:58:06 · answer #4 · answered by avery 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, you again!
I guess I don't get this question...was there a deeper meaning? lol.
Thanks for BA on the other though!
Kittens rock.
2006-11-04 20:04:50 · answer #5 · answered by powhound 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I'd only agree to it if it involved fetuses.
2006-11-04 19:57:42 · answer #6 · answered by Vadalia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋