English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Well one instance comes to mind immediately....

Racial discrimination when it comes to public defense. For example Muslims. While I personally understand that most Muslims are perfectly good people, there are a select few who "ruin it for the rest". But under our "tolerate and not discriminate" policy we cant just question Muslims because that would be "unfair" so we must question randomly... or question everybody, which wastes time and resources.

So this tolerance and un-biases-ness causes things to be less safe in my personal opinion. And if you dont consider it to be unsafe then at the very least it is a very big waste of resources and time.

2006-11-04 11:46:34 · answer #1 · answered by calcdffirefighter 3 · 0 0

Well if violent and/or hurtful acts are tolerated, then, yes that would make the world less safe.

Not sure if that's what you're looking for or not. Your question is not very clear.

2006-11-04 11:38:56 · answer #2 · answered by Consuming Fire 7 · 1 0

the more we turn our backs on, the more people think that it's OK to do what I want to do. So, let your mind think on this, soon there will be those that will do some really rot tin , and then try to justify their actions. with the way our courts and lawyers handle things now days, Id say the safety of the world is less stable and safe

2006-11-04 12:31:56 · answer #3 · answered by duster 6 · 0 0

change comes slowly tolerance is a small step but it is a step. give people time. we have to accept who they are before they will accept who we are.

2006-11-04 13:22:49 · answer #4 · answered by jusme 5 · 0 0

tolerance is c r a p, and anyone who is supportive of LGBT is automatically misunderstood by frightened, irresponsible, hate-filled, bigoted, homophobic, racist, dim-witted, homosapiens

2006-11-04 12:03:19 · answer #5 · answered by st.uncumber 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers