2006-11-04 11:21:27 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
An Implicit draft is in the works like John Kerry mentioned that the Conservatives want to cover up. Bush's deficit is out of control and the new Congress with Democrats will want diplomacy Bush is incapable to supply with his setup at present.
2006-11-04 21:33:22 · answer #1 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 14⤊ 1⤋
partly. don't love Bush. believe that the warfare in Iraq became planned lengthy till now it actual befell. Tony Blair and Bush were wanting to go in even if WMD were stumbled on. i quite dislike this administration. i became contained in the Air nationwide safeguard for 9/11, and had 4 a million/2 years of lively defense force provider from 1979 to 1983, so I completely understand the perspective of human beings contained in the defense force. as far as 9/11 being an interior activity, i'm not completely confident of that. There are particularly some information which have not been completely replied, yet I nonetheless imagine that even GWB couldn't be that evil. Who is conventional with although... from torturing human beings in college, dealing drugs, DWI convictions, AWOL and desertion... he's not quite a sterling personality. notwithstanding.
2016-11-28 19:02:47 · answer #2 · answered by klosterman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one knows. Especially Bush. He only says what he thinks the public wants to hear. If he were so great at Stay the Course, he would have not quit looking for the culprit of 9/11. Osama Bin Laden, roams free. Doesn't that scare you, like it does me? He needed Iraq, to look successful. How did he get this information? From Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld told him Iraq would be the lesser of two evils. So we rushed in unprepared. Now that it is backfiring, he is slowly (after 3 1/2 years) of Stay the Course policies, he is changing the story, saying he never said Stay the Course, that he is willing to change his tactics on the fight that continues in Iraq.
2006-11-04 13:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by Schona 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush plan is to stay in power long enough to finish looting the country for the richest Americans and then turn the war and the rest of the mess over to President Rhodam-Clinton on Jan.20th, 2009.
2006-11-04 14:23:23 · answer #4 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The stay part means to establish 3 permanent military bases in Iraq, So they can liberate all other countries in the region that have oil. I bet Dicky gets one hell of a kick back from Haliburton in about 2 years. I wish he'd take Rummy on a hunting trip.
2006-11-04 11:31:00 · answer #5 · answered by flip4449 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is a hero an cannot do wrong. If i say that enough i might start to believe it. Bush doesn't want to back out because country isn't stabilized, and will just be taken over by another regime.
The country may never be stabilized enough to leave. Bush wasn't trained in nation building.
2006-11-04 11:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush does not even know! He is too ashamed to admit he screwed up! Besides someone else is going to have to clean up his mess! For a man who was too coward served his country he has alot of nerve to sacrifice so many American lives! He won his place in history though! The dumbest president ever!
2006-11-04 11:35:25 · answer #7 · answered by ron 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The point is not to Win the War, it is to keep it going. War is big business for a few and as long as chaos reigns in Iraq there are people, most of them pals of GEO W, who will propser.
Peace....
2006-11-04 11:24:57 · answer #8 · answered by JVHawai'i 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why limit the discussion to Bush's plan? What about all the liberals? Do THEY have a plan other than retreat and give this victory to the terrorists?
I'm all for a change in strategy if it will help, but that's "help US" not "help the terrorists"!
2006-11-04 11:24:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Re flip4449: I agree with the oil bit, I am not so sure liberate is how most of the middle east would describe it.
2006-11-04 22:58:48 · answer #10 · answered by dB 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋