English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You could have your kids snached tomorrow by social services if someone does not like you they can phone social services and say anything about you they will take your family away and investigate, You will be in a state of anguish, fell powerless and emotional, if you verbally attack a social worker the feelings you have will change, on their file it will say depressed. out of control and suffering from a personality disorder, if when they are kidnapping your children you shout to them "just tell the truth" this makes you an emotional abuser. If this situation has got you worried then do something it could be you tomorrow research FORCED ADOPTION and please reply

2006-11-04 10:21:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

www.forced-adoption.com

2006-11-05 01:36:02 · update #1

10 answers

For better or for worse, there are lots of unfounded complaints to social
services, often by the errant spouse of the current custody holder, but
sometimes just be a nasty neighbor.

However, social services MUST err on the side of safety.

Unfortunately it is not always clear to me that kids are more safe with social
services than they are with a parent, even if that parent is potentially
abusing them.

If you were forced to make a judgement call about a household you just
walked in to, you'd be wrong a lot too.

2006-11-04 10:27:16 · answer #1 · answered by Elana 7 · 4 0

Well there was a case in the papers last week. This couple had three children and had a visit from a boy similar age. The elder boy was found in a suspicious position with one of the three children. The parents called the police who inturn got social services in. The examinations showed the girl could have been interfered with an instrument so this put the mother and father in suspicion. The three children were taken away and put into care. The parents were only given supervised visits every other wekend. After appeals and further investigations the parents were cleared and eventually got their children back after approx 2 or 3 years. So it does happen and nothing can bring back the missing years.

2006-11-04 12:29:10 · answer #2 · answered by butterfly55freedom 4 · 3 0

You can sue anyone for anything. But from what you describe, you have little to no chance of winning. First, she made these "false accusations" to you. Not to law enforcement, not in court, not to a third party. Even if the allegations were false, they have to be made to law enforcement to be actionable (or to a third party for it to possibly be slander/libel). Second, you WERE charged with DV. Just because the case was dropped doesn't mean it never happened. Additionally, you admit that you struck your child's father, which means you committed DV. Again, just because the court case was dropped doesn't mean it didn't happen. Social Services can take action on any credible information. They do not have to wait for a court to find you guilty of a crime. You can always contest their action. But you will run the risk of police then getting involved to investigate further. Honestly, based on the information you've provided, it sounds like you have some serious anger issues, which is likely why your child has been removed & you've been given a 2 month "cooling off" period. Mature a bit, cooperate with Social Services, stop assaulting people, stay out of trouble, and you'll GREATLY increase the chances of being reunited with your child. Don't do it, and you'll face longer (if not permanent) separation & growing legal fees.

2016-05-21 23:49:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

But not all accusations are false. And I think it is better for children to be taken for a short period while the parents are investigated then leave the child with potentially very dangerous people. I'm not saying they always get it right. A friend of mine had her todler taken away from her because they thought she was abusing her. What actually happened was my friend was cooking and little one grabbed her leg and made her jump and a tiny amount of oil burned her arm. My friend took her immediately to the doctor and the doctor called social services. They took the little away almost immedaitely (and the burn was pretty cleared in a couple of days) and she had to do all sorts of courses and counselling even though she is one of the best mothers I know. However, if she had been hurting her child and Social Services left the little one with her and she was seriously injured or killed, they would have been in the wrong. Surely it is better to make sure children are 100% safe then take a risk and a child loses it's life. And yes, I do have children.
Also, they social services prefer to keep the children with the natural parents if that is possible and is not putting that child in danger. Obviously in cases of suspected abuse they HAVE to take the child away straight away but in cases of neglect they will do their best to work with the parents and give them the help thy clearly need to be a better parent. My best friend is under social services after claims of neglect against her youngest (by her nasty ex). Baby is still with her but they are giving her the help she needs (even though she was NOT neglecting the baby they are still willing to help her).
They do a good job and it is only the minority they get wrong but those are the only ones that get reported. Not the thousands of correct decisions they make every day and the success stories.

2006-11-09 07:48:52 · answer #4 · answered by willowbee 4 · 0 0

Sorry - that is total bolloc*ks.

Don't believe everything you read in the newspapers. I know several people who work withi child protection - and there has to be very serious, and demonstrable, concern for a child before they would take action.

They would not just act on a single phone call - that would be the beginning of the investigation.

It is in no one's interest to seperate children from their parents, and usually they go out of their way to keep children at home.

If your children have been taken away by social services, then for some reason, they must feel it's warranted.

2006-11-04 10:26:34 · answer #5 · answered by Hello Dave 6 · 0 1

Typcially, unless the complaint has some evidence substantiating it, they don't do this. It's too traumatic for the child. However, if there is evidence something is going on in the house to hurt the child, they need to get the kids out of that situation as soon as possible.

2006-11-04 10:24:05 · answer #6 · answered by Vadalia 4 · 2 0

Thats typical of social services.The children in danger are left with there parents then social services always come up with a good excuse when the child ends up dead.

2006-11-08 06:28:21 · answer #7 · answered by Ollie 7 · 3 0

stop and think for a moment, what you are saying is silly. any and i mean any vulnerable human should have the opportunity to have someone there in the wings to rescue them and give them a real life back. we should be thankful we have a system like we do. ok its well underfunded but that is not the fault of social workers. i take my hat off to them they have a crappy job to do and it takes something special to do that work. in the end they never set out to hurt anyone in a vulnerable position. lets give them some praise for once forget the media horror stories its gossip mongering thats all.

2006-11-04 10:40:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

i wish social services would try to do some sh!t like that to me ! while they are harrassing innocent peope there are kids out there really getting abused they need to train there people better some dont have a clue on what they are doing more training .

2006-11-04 10:28:09 · answer #9 · answered by mz.thang 4 · 1 2

well i have heard of these stories before. but if you a lawful citizens e.respectful person in your community no one would have a reason to report you . but if you have a history of abused of your kids and your doing drugs it's the community duty to turn that person in .

2006-11-04 10:25:39 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers