English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am all for free speech, as I am a proponent of the First Amendment and a few other amendments if you really want to know the truth. I believe in Democracy and a few other 'ocracies' but by no means, am I going to transform into an arm-chair pundit. No, leave that for the arm-chair pundits! I got other things to concern myself with, like saving the world and building solid relationships with the backyard blog people and other misunderstood transients. I don't like too much hanging around with the elite, the bourgeoisie and other self-acclaimed VIP people. I find most of them boring and besides, they like to throw stones at a simple man like me - a writer who prefers writing about the "Struggle." The other night I was criticized for a piece I wrote: It was deemed to be too profane for the tastes of the gentrified folk:

So, to be fair I replied with my editorial. Here is an excerpt. I think I garnered some respect by staying true to my moral rectitude:

So, it was told that one of my Essays contained more "F" words than a cross-country bus filled with hedonists on their way to the "Blast of the Past" Convention in San Francisco. I'm sorry but I was expressing myself in ways that I ordinarily don't but had to stay true to the story. Besides, I had to get off my chest the two-hundred pound barbell that my three year old dropped while doing her bench presses.

Okay, now that I got that out the way, let me share these two items:

I had just heard that Hugh Hefner is sending a bunch of playmates to penal institutions across the country. Talk about hardened criminals. I will send a letter to Hugh and remind him that these are houses of corrections not houses of erections. I hope he understands my plea not to go ahead with his scheme.

Which reminds me, I was once a member of a hung jury. It was another sex case and I guess being hung was a prerequisite to an unbiased verdict. The woman on trial, though, she was toting two 44's and I couldn't help but render a decision based on the length of my inseam, which started at a 32 and ended at a 20.

2006-11-04 08:54:39 · 3 answers · asked by rickjfico 2 in Social Science Psychology

3 answers

What are you on? It can't be legal.

2006-11-04 09:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0 0

YOUR VOCABULARY STANDS OUT. BUT WHAT'S THE DIRECTION? WHOM DO YOU SEEK TO COMMUNOCATE WITH? AT WHAT GAIN? GOT JESUS? THE MORE YOU GIVE THE MORE YOU GET. MAY GOD BLESS YOU!!!
IN JESUS NAME

2006-11-04 17:00:28 · answer #2 · answered by thewindowman 6 · 0 1

haha Alrighty then!

2006-11-04 17:10:31 · answer #3 · answered by bettywitdabigbooty 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers