I've heard that Bill Clinton was a rapist and well as an adulterer. Any truth in it?

Answer 1

all politicians are. it is part of their job.

Answer 2

It would appear that the Clintons have been involved in a wide range of illegal and unsavory activities ranging from adultery, illegal drug use, trafficking, bribery, misappropriation of funds, real estate fraud, money laundering, national security violations, intimidation of witnesses, perjury, the pardon scandal, and the list goes on. There have also been an unusual number of suspicious deaths and suicides of associates of theirs. Coincidence, I'm sure. I'm absolutely stunned that the Clinton's still have such a following when they *should* get tarred and feathered in whatever town they show their faces in. It just goes to show how ill-informed, morally bankrupt, and "star stuck" many Americans are, especially on the left.

And it's not just Slick Willy who's hands are dirty either. God forbid Hillary ever get into the oval office! That sociopath is probably the scarier of the two. Bill is driven by his privates. I get the impression that Hillary's are frozen and she's driven instead by her heart... also frozen. It's a travesty that such a hypocrite, liar and manipulator is a **** senator!

I recommend searching the archives at www.wnd.com. Great site. You can also find yourself a copy of The Clinton Chronicles DVD online or on Google video. You really don't have to look too far! This is one dirty group. It's no wonder that they and some of their cronies have earned the nickname "The Clintonistas".

Answer 3

LOL, Yes there is some truth to it. But it depends on how you define adultery. LOL.

Clinton was not/is not a rapist.

Bill was an adulterer if you consider oral sex to constitute infidelity. If you don't consider that to be "sex," then no, he's not. (Don't get on my case, some people don't consider it to be infidelity)

I suppose that Bill could still be an adulterer these days, but I kind of doubt that he's been unfaithful lately.

Of course, adultery is not a crime.

Answer 4

Yes he was very well as an adulterer. Is your news in some kind of a time warp delay? I think I might use your party's tactics, and have your question removed because I don't like it, and if I don't like it, it must be wrong.

Get a brain, and try turning on the television for some more current news.

Answer 5

If a individual is accused of rape that would not propose the guy is a rapist it potential that the guy would be investigated and positioned on trial if adequate information is discovered to help a declare of rape. contained in relation to Broaddrick and Clinton the case had lots greater to it then merely a “he pronounced, she pronounced” and criminal action, civil or criminal, grew to become into ever further against Clinton. so which you ought to respond to your question is invoice Clinton a rapist, no he's no longer. His sexual history isn't correct by using fact if a guy who has intercourse (oral or in any different case) with an intern would not make him a rapist… in any different case there could be much greater politicians in reformatory. EDIT: somewhat your question grew to become into approximately invoice Clinton and being a existence long democrat would not propose a individual is extremely probable to accuse somebody of rape. interior the Juanita Broaddrick case she had recanted her tale a number of cases and her (or invoice’s) sexual history grew to become into no longer taken under consideration by using fact there grew to become into in no way a tribulation. in case you have a undeniable venture it somewhat is weighing heavily on your recommendations according to danger you ought to positioned up that case somewhat then leaping around and making unintelligible claims and assumptions. EDIT (as quickly as greater): "So then no rape cases pass unreported?" the place did I propose that? of direction rape cases pass unreported. "Why are you condemning somebody who made a declare of rape whilst until now you criticized me for saying such claims must be examined heavily?" What? Who am I condemning? I pronounced Clinton grew to become into no longer a rapist by using fact allegations and media frenzy are actually not an alternate choice to an somewhat trial. Stick the information and what people somewhat say somewhat than construction straw men arguments that are ridiculous and glaring.

Answer 6

What we do know is that Bill Clinton was an adulterer over and over and over.....

Answer 7

He was accused of coercement, but Paula Jones later admitted that she was very impressed by him (read: she was impressed, and then she regretted the fact that she slept with him), and yes, he was an adulterer. Probably still is.

Answer 8

Adulterer=DUH.

Answer 9

Why are you more worried about President Clinton then the one who took us to an unnecessary war?

Answer 10

It's hard to say. We know we can't take Bill Clintons word for anything, he has proven himself a liar.

He lied about something as stupid as having sex, but he did it in a place as serious as a grand jury hearing. So if he is willing to lie about sex, what else would he be willing to lie about??? Rape??? I would think so.... Real estate scams??? i would think so....

the list is endless.

Also, why would someone pardon a man who was convicted of 13 counts of sexual assault, and possesion of child pornograph? Clinton did that also.

Answer 11

Yes, the accusation has been made.

And in our country, just making an accusation seems to be enough, since our government no longer requires any proof of wrongdoing before punishing someone for it.