unfortunatly, there's no way to tell. due to the change in history, the world would be completly diffrent.
2006-11-04 08:20:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Doctor Cornbread 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
For one thing I am Indian and from Asia but I think I would be a slave.At the populace we have today I think controlling slaves would be difficult.So they would become rebels like in the Civil War.It would not be like the Civil War when generals sign documents and it is formal.Escaped slaves would be
Guerrilla fighters (what I would do after escape) and free
slaves and kill racist dirt bags HA HA!But that is how it would be
like.No place would be safe.It would be an on going battle and
escaped slaves would Carry out sneak attacks.
2006-11-04 08:54:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We wood of gotten rid of slavery a long time ago, not that many southerners owned slaves anyway. The South would not have all the crime that seeps down from the North. If the carpet baggers had not taken everything that was left after the criminal Sherman burned the south down, it would not have taken us so long to become the best part of this country!!
2006-11-04 08:28:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by dakota29575 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US would be two separate countries. See, it wasn't truly a Civil War. A Civil War is when two entities are fighting for control of the same government. the Confederacy just wanted out, so they could form their own government.
2006-11-04 08:23:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i provides you with a protracted and knowledgeable dissertation that would convince you why Hitler and the Nazi occasion ought to on no account have risen to capacity if the CSA had "gained" the Civil conflict, yet i'm going to refrain. we could suffice it to assert that your proposition is punctiliously unbelievable. If by some capacity, previous all good judgment and risk it could have come to bypass that the CSA and Nazi Germany got here to co-exist interior the 1940's, i'm able to assert unequicocally that the federation of southern states does no longer have supported Nazi Germany. in spite of the problem of slavery, the southern aristocracy had much extra advantageous ties to England than the North did and help for Nazi Germany could have been extra or much less non-existent. And, as a remember of historic actuality, extra southerners enlisted in hopes of battling the Nazis than did northerners previous to the statement of conflict, if it incredibly is any indication approximately the place southern sentiments lay. Now i'm going to handle a number of your different suppositions. notwithstanding if the CSA had controlled to income independence, i promises a powerful argument why slavery ought to no longer have persisted for yet another 80 years. i'm able to additionally supply convincing evidence that Hitler replaced into no longer "all approximately white capacity" , that the south does no longer have been any further a "Christion united states" than u.s. is immediately, and that persons interior the middle East are no longer forced to worship Allah. yet i'm able to't blame you for such silly ideals. I settle for the unhappy actuality that the international is crammed with slender-minded and opinionated people who have not have been given any genuine carry close of background and opt to stay blind to the info. Judging from the tricks you have dropped approximately your ideals, you will possibly in all probability have made a impressive candidate for recruitment by capacity of the Nazis had you lived in Germany previous to WWII.
2016-10-21 06:36:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by oleyar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think slavery may still exist. The US may not have entered WW1. WW2 may not have happened. The North and South may have been trading partners or the South maybe trading other countries due to the possibility of a trade sanction on the Confederate states of America.
The US would continue because it really does not need the agriculture South to continue unless other Union states would succeed to the South.
The world would be different.
2006-11-04 08:24:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
not much different, many confederates wanted an end to slavery, the economics would be much different as each state would more than likely have a currency, which would be confusing.
2006-11-04 08:25:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There would be a fragmented United States.
2006-11-04 08:23:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably have a president from Texas on his second term.
2006-11-04 08:32:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by kman1830 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our world, picture a city inhabited by all homeless people, thats what you would have.
2006-11-04 08:25:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋