Again - what is your question?
You should be proud of your Indian heritage. But those cultures do not exist in a pure form any more.
European royalty doesn't really impress me so much anyway. I find what little information about the native cultures you mention much more interesting.
2006-11-04 08:31:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by carl l 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Aztecs and Incans Prince and Princesses are no longer alive and if they are they do not have the wealth or share the history the way England and America do. There is a deep connection to England Royalty and Americas independance that you may never understand.
2006-11-07 02:56:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by yellabanana77 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Truth is, for reasons of history, Americans know about British royalty and little about the rest (other than the royals of Monaco because of the Grace Kelly thing). You read the odd story about about Japanese royalty and the very, very occasional story about an African king acting up, like in the Kingdom of Lesotho.
But in the popular American imagination, Elizabeth II is the only queen they really know anything about and most don't really know much about her or her family other then as celebrities.
2006-11-04 16:25:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rob B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Simply put North and South America are new continents with "new" forms of government, new meaning, different way of having a democracy, dictatorship, etc. And all of the Americas were discovered and settled by people who didn't want to be ruled by a monarchy so that's why many of our countries fought wars against Britain, France, Spain, etc. The only place I know of that is still ruled by a monarchy, at least halfway is Canada.
2006-11-04 18:38:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ONLY because there is still royalty in Europe.
The lineage in the Meso-American heritage has been broken and we don't see a current Incan King or a Mayan Emperor
2006-11-04 16:00:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm both, blue blooded from my mom and red from my dad,its weird but eye opening.
Its not really the blood that makes the person a true royal. to be royal or a king is the person themself and their actions.
If you noticed the royals that we learn about the most are those that stood out and became REAL leaders, no matter whether if their leadership was really horrible or great.
2006-11-07 00:09:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by little sister 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question really needs to be rephrased because I have no idea what you're asking and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.
2006-11-04 16:04:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by blueturtlethunder 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Man you really need to work on your questions. This is the second one I see that makes no sense.
2006-11-04 16:56:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by jasonheavilin 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, I didn't know that there were still active Mayan Kings? Are there?
2006-11-04 15:57:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
do you know for sure that EVERY american thinks that?
and american means all of north and south america
2006-11-04 16:23:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋