They see that North Korea is safe now, and Iraq / Afghanistan were not.
http://www.portalino.it/nuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=18792
2006-11-04 07:26:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do you have one of those calendars with an anti-American sentiment for each day?
2006-11-04 07:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NK was threatening nukes when Clinton was in office. blows your theory. about it being Dubya. The threat of nuclear power provides a means of manipulative control over the other countries of the world. as Iran or NK and countries of their ilk are looking to have a hold on the rest of the world it is not a democratic thing or a repbulican thing. get off the bash bush band wagon and you might have presented a half decent question.
2006-11-04 15:35:00 · answer #2 · answered by Teresa A 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
rumor has it that Russia our old enemy of the cold war is now becoming our cold war enemy again. just like in vietnam the US and Russia are fighting a war using smaller nations in our power struggle against one another. we can't exactly go to war on that large of a scale because both sides are actually in fear of using nukes against the other. so we play the game that we know so well. Russia is supplying Iran and much of the middle east with nuclear capabilities with the ultimate goal of creating another dynasty like they had in the 600's. they have never given up in their goal of being the worlds super power.
2006-11-04 15:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He also won't invade countries with genocides occurring, unless big money can be earned. If only he would have known how hard it would be in Iraq. And I don't want to hear that "he said it would be hard" crap. It was a horrendous miscalculation.
2006-11-04 15:35:37 · answer #4 · answered by Truth Erector 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh, knock it off... George W. Bush does not have a POLICY about invading non-nuclear countries. Your "question" is designed to rile people up by misleading them into thinking your statement is true.
2006-11-04 15:32:16 · answer #5 · answered by princessmeltdown 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes. America is known as an empirialist state. Other countires are using nuclear capabilities as a way of "protecting" itself, but mostly as way of thumbing their noses at American diplomacy.
2006-11-04 15:29:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Encourage isn't the word for it. They published information on the net, on how to build one. Then , due to criticism, they removed it. I don't get it. Keep the threat of terror alive, I guess.
2006-11-04 15:31:28 · answer #7 · answered by flip4449 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
only if the UN allows hostile countries... which is never going to happen.
2006-11-04 15:30:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes for sure.
2006-11-04 15:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no
2006-11-04 15:29:06 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋