Now that it is apparent he strategy was a faliure
2006-11-04 06:22:27 · 9 answers · asked by JS 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In order to change strategy he would have had to have one in the first place.
2006-11-04 06:27:26 · answer #1 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's hardly a failure. By the end of the year 50% of Iraq will be in the hands of the Iraqi government with over 500,000 trained police and soldiers. By the first or second quarter of next year, probably 75% of Iraq would be under Iraqi control. By the end of 2007 or the begining of 2008 100% of Iraq would be turned over. Also note that Iraq has a democratically elected government now. What has the opponents gained? They haven't gained land, power or influence.
2006-11-04 06:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The strategy has always been:
1. Invade Iraq somehow, even if we have to lie about it.
2. Spend billions with no accountability thereby creating the biggest sink-hole of money ever created and funnel all of that money to a handful of ultra-rich Americans.
3. Sustain that sink-hole of money for a long as possible.
The goal has always been the Reverse Robin Hood Theory. Steal from the poor and give to the rich.
2006-11-04 06:28:35 · answer #3 · answered by Believe in Possibilities 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is that the strategy of getting the Scots to do all the fighting? Remember he pulled 11,000 US soldiers out of Northern Iraq and sent in 700 Black Watch soldiers to finish what the yanks started!
2006-11-04 06:28:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Learn the differences between strategy & tactics. The strategy is to create a situation that enables Iraq to be a stable democracy. We don't yet know if it will work. Tactics are changing.
2006-11-04 06:24:45 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
He did no longer resign, he replaced into fired. And if he replaced into going to propose Bush that some drastic changes neede to be made, he replaced into in basic terms declaring the plain and doubtless attempting to shop his job. Bush had desperate the Rumsfeld had to circulate some weeks previously. modern "concepts " are a entire failed police.
2016-10-21 06:26:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we have PROFESSIONALS who advise on those issues! Let's leave the fighting to the professionals!
2006-11-04 06:28:22 · answer #7 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what you mean he didn't tell you. I guess you are just out of the loop.
2006-11-04 06:24:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
because it would mean he is human with faults.
2006-11-04 06:25:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋