Should only be aloud for a minor who has been raped. Other than that, if you have s.ex without using protection you should be old enough and mature enough to know the consequences and deal with them. If you wouldn't be fit to be a parent, give the poor child up for adoption.
2006-11-04 05:47:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by ღღღ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think abortions should include strict regulations. Like if a vicitm of rape or maybe even a first time because I hate to see children that are neglected or in bad households because their mother was irresponsible. After the first it should not be allowed because it would help from people being reckless. Anyway I believe in choice of a woman however have strict regulations becuase some women don't care enough about themselves to wrap it up. Adoption can be a blessing or hell for a child....not sure how i feel about that.
2006-11-04 05:47:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by AUDREY H 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe it's always a personal choice and many people today want to impose their personal values on someone else.
Pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. It means it's none of my business. It means it's a personal choice and I don't believe I have the right to make judgements about other peoples lives-that we don't know when life begins excepting when the fetus is viable outside the womb. If Pro-Lifers believe in no abortions(I wouldn't force them to have them), that's fine but how about coming up with a plan to help those women/girls and babies through life? I believe many pro-lifers seem to acknowledge one side of the so called pro-life issues(Can you be anti-abortion and pro-war and pro-death penalty?)
Anti-abortion laws hurt women but it is mostly poor and lower middle-class-the more affluent go out of state. Before Roe V Wade, the poor girls went on welfare, the middle class girls got married to whoever would have them and the upper class girls disappeared for a trip to an Aunt's and came back not pregnant.
2006-11-04 06:27:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I personally would never have an abortion and I would try to keep my child, sister, or friend from having one by talking to them, but I don't have the right to tell you a total stranger what you can and can not do. But in the case of partial birth abortions it is something different only a monster would want to do or have one.
2006-11-04 05:45:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by dakota29575 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Politicians and evangelicals are preaching bad science, trying to make you think abortion is killing a baby. It removes an embryo that can't feel pain yet. It's painful enough for the woman without someone else sticking their nose in.
2006-11-04 05:46:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kacky 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would like to see the need for abortion reduced, but for the time being, the abortion laws stay in place to give a choice
2006-11-04 05:39:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that abortion is an individuals concern and should not be a matter where your neighbor has as much to say about it as you. Strictly between a woman (married couple) and their doctor.
2006-11-04 05:42:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There should be some exceptions but someone should never be allowed an abortion becuase they are irresponsible.
2006-11-04 05:43:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
sure, what the heck- people die all the time: while youre asleep, while you're taking a dump.
2006-11-04 05:52:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by andyheretic 2
·
0⤊
0⤋