Which one of these folks has been engaged in firefights in our Nations defense? Has any of them put themselves in harms way, in our Nations defense?
2006-11-04 05:14:37 · 9 answers · asked by rideitmark 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Kerry- served with honor and bravery.
Sen. George Allen, never served
Bush The Lesser- AWOL
Cheney- "other priorities"
Jeb Bush- never served
Rush Limbaugh- never served
Tom DeLay- never served
Scarborough- never served
O'Reilly- never served
Dennis "I know nothing" Hastert- never served
Trent Lott- never served
Brit Hume- never served
Roger Ailes- never served
KKKarl Rove- never served
Scooter Libby- never served
David Limbaugh- never served
Bill Bennett- never served
Newt Gingrich- never served
Sean Hannity- never served
Michael Savage- never served
Gary Bauer- never served
John Bolton- never served
Andy Card- never served
Jerry Falwell- never served
Roy Blount- never served
Sen. Saxby Chambliss- never served
BTW, the only firefight Cheney was ever in involved shooting a hunting partner. . .
2006-11-04 05:28:45 · answer #1 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think Dick Chaney and Donald Rumsfeld both fought in the war of 1812.
But seriously, I do not consider combat as a litmus test for a leader. Nor do will I allow it to be a crutch for stupidity. Kerry's words were ignorant and not well thought out. He should have known better. I call out Bush when he says something stupid and I sure the hell will do the same with any public figure.
2006-11-04 05:20:06 · answer #2 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well you know them Chicken Hawk Republicans...
They'll just blame their mommies if they have to!
Bush & Cheney have killed MORE than Kerry
and Kerry was IN Vietnam!
2006-11-04 05:17:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kerry, obviously. But Cheney does go quail hunting a lot...
2006-11-04 05:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is rather between the main humane wars we've ever fought. We nevertheless have not lost one % of the squaddies we lost in international conflict II. And in spite of the reality that the prisons carry our enemies for an indeterminable length of time, you are able to desire to word that so some distance we've placed certainly NO muslims in any ovens, or experimented with them, or practiced our beheading concepts, or used them as objective prepare. i think of the genuine sadism is letting the conflict circulate this long interior the 1st place. we could desire to continuously have a miles less humane conflict, so our squaddies (that consists of me) can come abode to our families, incredibly of spend year after year in yet another united states on a similar time as a liberal government (who has way much less veterans than the conservatives) tries to run a conflict they know no longer something approximately.
2016-10-21 06:22:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey now...it was tough getting those 5 deferments (Cheyney). And you think it was easy for Bush to pound budweisers and toke lines of cocaine while Kerry was in Vietnam getting shot?
2006-11-04 05:18:39 · answer #6 · answered by Cold Stone 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If Kerry's fellow vets are right then it would be Cheney, After all Cheney was trying to protect us from those evil quails
2006-11-04 05:18:39 · answer #7 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Santa Clause
2006-11-04 05:19:16 · answer #8 · answered by Somone 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
kerry
2006-11-04 05:16:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋