In the United States. Should they be allowed to do this? after all they are quick to pull our questions off Yahoo Answers for the tiniest of reasons.
2006-11-04 03:33:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We (republicans) have been told we should not vote that we hate republican control in government that all of our elected officials are scum and that we are dissatisfied with an unmatched economy for six years and you have the nerve to complain about some nonexistent bias against a democrat?
2006-11-04 03:52:07 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
because of the fact he's no longer an interest hog like Clinton. basically shine a spotlight someplace, and Clinton will look. basically examine out the way he took over the clicking briefing and shoved Obama out. maximum former presidents have greater dignity. interior the final 4 years GW has written a e book and led inner maximum fundraising efforts interior the united states for disaster alleviation, after the 2010 Haiti earthquake (at Obama's request). I relatively have additionally seen George and Laura welcoming US troop individuals residing house. as a techniques because of the fact the ranch, he replaced into almost ten years older. perhaps he did no longer prefer to handle that a lot property to any extent further. i've got faith that way now and back. i like how Libs forget with reference to the certainty that GW additionally inherited the dot-com recession, to boot because of the fact the weakened protection tension intelligence gadget and theory of the U. S. that allowed 9/11 to take place. he basically isn't the whiner that Obama is.
2016-10-15 09:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you throw a handful of stones at a pack of dogs, the only ones that yelp are the ones that get hit. It's the same with truth & politics; truth is only truth until it hits a liberal, then it's propaganda most foul and shouldn't be allowed.
And Yahoo doesn't pull questions, the software is programmed to pull questions & answers after receiving a given number of reports. Many libs know this, and will repeatedly report any comments that don't agree with their point of view in an effort to silence the opposition. So much for Freedom Of Speech...
2006-11-04 04:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since this is the USA and we observe freedom of speech - yahoo can post whatever they'd like to post. Unlike NBC who refused to air promotional ads for The Dixie Chicks' movie - "Shut up and Sing" (or something like that) obviously fearing it would not show our articulate, competent President in a good light. LOL
As far as your comment indicating how our q & a's are censored here - I totally agree with you. One of my questions asking if there was any interest in a poker game in my area was pulled recently. Oh well!
2006-11-04 03:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by Kasha 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That was real news and NOT propaganda and Yahoo News can
be allowed to print the news just like the rest of the news media
and the questions that they pull off are objectionable.
2006-11-04 03:42:18 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I've no axe to grind, I'm British. My observation was the opposite view. Is your political perspective biased?
2006-11-04 06:22:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since I didn't see it, I don't know. But the mainstream media does it all the time on TV and in print regarding the Republicans.
2006-11-04 03:36:00 · answer #7 · answered by Saved 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, whatever. You ever heard of the word "opinion"?
2006-11-04 12:59:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish they were. As if Yahoo supported Republicans hahahaha.
2006-11-04 03:42:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Election of who, not a president? So what.
Silver Birch
2006-11-04 03:36:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋