Do you think mp3 is good for the world? Has anyone realized that mp3 is EXTREMELY poor quality of the real thing?
2006-11-04 02:56:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
what is the best quality???
2006-11-04 02:57:40 · answer #1 · answered by Noddles 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what MP3 settings you are using.
For the Internet standard, most people probably aren't going to notice much difference, save for perhaps classical music fans, since classical tends to use the higher end of the frequency spectrum, and also has more extreme dynamic differences [contrast between loud and soft parts].
2006-11-04 11:01:15 · answer #2 · answered by Lunarsight 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course stevo. .wav files are way higher quality. Its just easy to compress the sound into an mp3
2006-11-04 11:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by jwurm99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WELL:MAYBE YOU ARE RIGHT:BUT TO CARRY MY SOUND SYSTEM AROUND OUTSIDE IS FAR TOO COMPLICATED:I AM EXTREMELY HAPPY WITH MY GREAT MP3 PLAYER:CREATIVE 60GB.
2006-11-04 11:01:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
ok...but iPods are cool...so I dont think they're poor quality
2006-11-04 11:03:20 · answer #5 · answered by Rosie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea it sucks
i dropped mine and the screen cracked and then the entire thing didn't work
it sucks
2006-11-04 11:09:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i prefer the ipod myself. i think they have better quality and will lat longer. my friends have had better luck with ipods.
2006-11-04 11:06:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont own one
prolly never will
2006-11-04 10:59:35 · answer #8 · answered by 4 strings 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
does it really matter
2006-11-04 10:58:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no & yes.
2006-11-04 11:34:10 · answer #10 · answered by {{birthday girlie}} 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋