The Congressman. The page in question is over the age of consent, so that is not an issue, being gay. The "Senator" obviously does not have what it takes to be Commander in Chief!
2006-11-04 02:04:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
i would choose the senator that "mistakenly" called our troops today uneducated, because their is a legitimate chance that he did not mean to say what he said. But if he did mean to say what he said, what is untruthful about what he said? A majority of the trooops today either join to gain the opurtunity to become educated or need a job. I personally would not have publicly said what john kerry said, but i would rather choose the senator that has the balls to say something over the man who was supposed to be protecting children from predators, while all the whil being the predator(he was probably trying to clear the field lol).
2006-11-04 02:04:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by smartass 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If I had to I'd reason that a 19 y.o. is considered an adult and should be able to put this scum in his place. If the IM was sent to a minor he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and saving me the trouble of punishing him myself.
To defame our Military injures all of it's citizens, demoralizes men and women risking their lives to protect idiots like Kerry's freedom to spout off and actually be in a Senator.
2006-11-04 02:25:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kerry actually called President Bush uneducated, so your question has a false premise.
And Congressman Foley was sending e-mails to 16 year old pages (not 19), all pages are 16 or 17, they are High School juniors.
Mark Foley is far sleazier than John Kerry could ever dream of being. So it's Kerry.
2006-11-04 02:02:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by parrotjohn2001 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Well it doesn't take a giant brain to realize that Kerry made a gross mistake when he tried to make a joke. Everyone knows that he himself was in the service and saw action in Viet Nam. He has the highest regards for the troops. It's a no brainier I'd choose the senator who made a stupid mistake over the admitted pedophile senator.
I'd advise Kerry to use one of Bush's speech writer.
2006-11-04 02:19:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by sparks 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well the Senator that hates the military would be a threat to our national security and our way of life.
The Senator that IM's an "18" yr old paige isn't threatening anyone's security except the victim if they choose to be a victim....
The ideology of both disgusts me but only one threatens my family and that would be the one that hates the military... So I if I HAD to vote for just one of them I would vote for the queer guy.
2006-11-04 02:13:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by noobienoob2000 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No matter how much guys try to twist and distort the Foley FACTs. The page was not 19 years old and he still abused his position by preying on the kids he worked with.
I would choose John Kerry, since Foley RESIGNED.
He was not fired like some of you conservatives seem to like to say. John Kerry John Kerry John Kerry.
2006-11-04 02:11:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you would really force me to choose - probably the first.
Perhaps he would put more effort into making our education system the best in the world since, after all, that is what is providing our "uneducated" (yours/his word - not mine) soldiers.
2006-11-04 02:06:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by 63vette 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The senator. Stupidity can be fixed, perversion is more pernicious
(To be honest, I never voted for Kerry in 2004 and i would never vote GOP)
2006-11-04 02:02:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not exactly apples to apples, but I see your point.......I suppose I would HAVE TO take a third party candidate seriously.....Damn....
2006-11-04 02:04:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋