English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think Robert de niro he is well better and fit aswell hes a more interesting actor and good to watch

2006-11-03 22:02:05 · 22 answers · asked by catherine m 2 in Entertainment & Music Movies

22 answers

Robert De Niro by a mile. He seems to play any role with class that he is given. He also has too many class films to mention

2006-11-03 22:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by KEN YAD 2 · 0 0

Although i love De Niro wholeheartedly-i have to say that Al Pacino is the better actor.Whatever movie Al is in he always gives something unique to the character he becomes.When you watch Scarface you dont think of his role as Michael Corleone in The Godfather movies although they are in the same genre of film-this goes beyond the fact that he is playing a different character but merely is reflected by the fact that he immerses himself in the role to the point it consumes him.His facial expressions change-he adapts different mannerisms-whatever role he plays you dont see Al pacino the actor or icon but the character he is portraying-wheras De Niro-although a fantastic actor and is undoubtedly up there with Pacino has let himself down lately with The Meet the Parents rubbish and that cameo on Extras!Al wouldnt do that!

2006-11-03 22:19:52 · answer #2 · answered by saffron s 2 · 0 0

Robert De Niro plays his roles fantastic. Al Pacino, too.

2006-11-03 23:57:40 · answer #3 · answered by The LOST Thing 4 · 0 0

Pacino has a much greater range. De Niro is perhaps regarded more highly by 'method' actors.
I think Pacino was amazing in 'Glengarry Glenross' and De Niro was absolutely bloody awful in Frankenstein. But so was everybody else.

2006-11-03 22:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Al Pacino

2006-11-03 22:09:26 · answer #5 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 0 0

Both awesome actors, but at a push I would have to go for Pacino.

2006-11-03 22:07:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ugh i'm a Knicks fan yet god dammit Melo is plenty too overrated. I assure he's not the main suitable shooter. a million. i've got seen Lebron play and now and lower back Durant and that i'm gonna would desire to assert Durant yet via a narrow margin. 2, maximum for their group... Lebron. he's a huge group participant. He gets rather everyone in touch whilst needed + he scores an exceedingly intense quantity. 3. Hmm, this one's a complicated question. i'd say Knicks desire Melo the main. are not getting me incorrect, those 3 communities desire their significant stars plenty yet Knicks would suck the main without Melo. We could no longer even get previous the 1st around of play-offs till he got here.

2016-10-03 06:34:04 · answer #7 · answered by blumenkrantz 4 · 0 0

I think both are very great actors and I'm fan of both but I think pacino is a bit better.
you can see the power of pacino in "scent of a woman".

2006-11-03 22:18:09 · answer #8 · answered by engineer 1 · 0 0

Al all the way. He does different roles and characters.

99.9% of the time, De Niro is the same, ex-gov type bloke.

2006-11-03 22:18:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm no fan of either but I'll say Pacino because he was actually very good in the Merchant of Venice.

2006-11-03 22:07:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers