English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

No, they found some degraded chemical and biological weapons from the 1980's Iran - Iraq war. Saddam had enriched uranium from his reactor, but it was under seal of the UN inspectors, and had been inspected right before the invasion. In any event, this uranium was NOT weapons grade.

2006-11-03 22:18:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes they found small amounts, but what I don't get is why everyone claims it was a lie told on purpose by Bush.
Quotes
John Kerry- "There is cause enough for the world community to hold him accountable by use of force, if necessary. The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to re-accept them, that he has continued to build those weapons."
Not only Kerry, but Clinton, France, Spain, England, and last but not least the United Nations. At least be honest folks. Enough of the party propaganda that everyone knows is a lie only spoken to further your parties agenda.

2006-11-04 06:42:33 · answer #2 · answered by mark g 6 · 0 0

That's "Weapons of MASS destruction". Guess you're talking about Iraq. No they did not. They were not even close. Furthermore, as bad as Sadam Hussein was, he kept the country from falling apart which is what it's doing right now.

2006-11-04 05:57:49 · answer #3 · answered by luosechi 駱士基 6 · 0 1

Nope, why because it was a mde up excuse to get revenge on Saddem, it had nothing to do with human rights, as we are now told, as some of ur allies have much worse records on that, espically Saudi Arabia, but they are in bed with the Bush's and Chenny's of this world, so they can do who and what they want

2006-11-04 08:30:52 · answer #4 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 0

"Weapons of destruction"

Tibbes, you having a voting card is MORE dangerous than an IED.

My Gawd...how does a country as great as ours produce this kind of citizen? Is it a symptom of a nation in decline or the result?

2006-11-04 07:15:26 · answer #5 · answered by angelthe5th 4 · 0 0

They didn't besides some left overs.Nothing like they claimed and scared the people about.Like all the talk about a mushroom cloud.
Watch the tape for full coverage

2006-11-04 06:34:32 · answer #6 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0 0

Of course not. That was a lie to get into Iraq. But we did find the oil we went in there for.

2006-11-04 06:23:47 · answer #7 · answered by redstorm 3 · 0 1

weapons of mass destruction a made up word ,scarey found nothing saddam took him so ,our cost?http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

2006-11-04 05:55:15 · answer #8 · answered by aqua 4 · 0 0

Despite all the waffle and BS given out by the allies the brief answer is NO!!!
But that's not it was really all about was it????

2006-11-04 06:12:37 · answer #9 · answered by budding author 7 · 0 1

Do you count thousands of nerve gas shells ( SARIN GAS ) ?
Saddam swore up and down he didn't have any .
How about bombs and rockets loaded with mustard gas , he didn't have them either .

2006-11-04 05:53:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers