Do you think US government will repeat his mistakes on Iran?

Question

Dear friends
Why US does not let people of other countries live their own ways? Is this democracy to force other people to live our way?is this government Father and other countries are his children?

Answer 1

1- I think it better be wise enough not to do it.since Iran is not Iraq nor Afghanistan.and if US does this mistake it means it is the end of USA.
2- I see some expanation with other friends here.like the one named up here 63vett.i like to let you know more :
A- our government told lies all the time.about Iraq/about 9/11 attackes and never made it clean why if they were not aware of this attacks who told all jews people( from israel) in these building to be our of work in that day.and other people 20 of them were my close friends to stay there and get killed?
B- they are telling us that moslems are terrorists so find a way to go to islamic countries and kill peoples over there and get their oils and so no one can say anything since they are fighting against terorists? but all of us know this is not true either.
C- Yes it was not right to go to US embassy and get the people there.but ever have you asked yourself why they did it?those people kicked the SHAH down ( some one worse than saddam hossein) who used to kill people and get them in jails with USA supports.so when those people had the revolution the usa was anger of them becuse he lost a best friend ( shah).I think they did it to us to make us think what is going on in iran.and what usa had done to iranian people who no one likes americans.but now they are telling us they like americans who respect them.
D- us army went to Iraq to kick out saddam not because to help their people and bring them democracy but because saddam was not saying " yes sir" any more as he usually used to say during Iraq-Iran war.In this war while many countries ( germany with chemical weapons.and france and ...)encloding usa helped saddam to bomed iranian people and killed many people over there.just becuse our top government are thinking about oil and money,and their share in this way and nothing more.
3- I hope we think one more time and don't mixed everything with the words " terrorism and ...."since terrorism are all over the world and in our country too.can you tell me how many young people get killed everyday here in usa ? in schools and out of streets aren't these people terorists? are all of them muslems? so see the facts and find a better solution to fight terorism. we are looking for peace for all people around the world.and we are sure that any other country will not come from far asia to usa and bothers us.but if we go there and start to bother them we should waite for them to bother us people all around the world.so let us live our own in peace and hope peac for other too.
good luck for all.

Answer 2

There are many sayings in the US that reflect the attitudes of Americans about living our own way and these are applied by most Americans to other peoples and nations. For Example:

"Live and Let Live.'
"Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You"

The laws in the United States give each person the right to live their life as they wish as long as doing so does not violate the rights of another person.

The attitudes created by the above sayings and laws are generally the attitudes applied to dealing with other people and nations.

The problem seems to be that these are not the attitudes that the American people are seeing from other peoples and nations. Americans see other peoples (in the Mid-East for example) giving political power to extremists and religious leaders who advocate the destruction of other nations and peoples. This goes against our principles of allowing a person to live their life as they want as long as it does not violate the rights of another person. When Americans see that these leaders of other nations want to destroy America and our freedoms then they must do something to preserve their country and way of life.

So, if you follow what I am trying to say, democracy is not forcing other people to live our way. However, it is the right to prevent someone else forcing us to live their way.

Answer 3

Iraq has a lot of oil. Iran has even more. Of course we will. First we will lie to the world about Iran so we can make them look bad. Before we invaded Iraq we misdirected everyone by telling them they had weapons of mass destruction. Our real purpose was to secure the oil. Which was the very first thing our military secured once we were in there.

In Iran we are currently trying out the lie that they are building nuclear weapons. It seems to be catching on. This will justify are need to violate all their rights and probably kill a million innocent people.

But in the long run, by our American standards, that is a small price to pay for the large economic benefits of oil.

Answer 4

People are allowed to live as they chose as long as they do not kill,murder and threaten others as the Islamic terrorists have done.

The Islamic terrorists have been attacking Americans since 1968
when Sirhan-Sirhan murdered Bobby Kennedy, the Attorney General of the United States.

And from 1979 and the Iranian -U.S. Embassy crisis when Islamic terrorists in Iran captured 77 hostages from the American Embassy and kept them for appproximately 5 years until December of 2001, Islamic terrorists committed over 1,000 terrorists attacks around the world killing over 20,000 ppeople of all ethnic backgrounds. And Americans killed numbered approximately 14,000 of this amount.

Remeber, they attacked the U.S. First. They attacked us over the administrations of five American Presidents both Democrat and Republican. And all of their attacks were unprovoked.

President Bush simply drew a line in the sand and said NO MORE. Now we are defending ourselves. If other Islamic leaders and people do not like it, they should police the Islamic Terrorists within their own country so that we do not have to.

For example the Taliban had ample time to turn Bin-Laden over
to some one other than the U.S. such as Saudi Arabia where he was wanted for criminal acts. And Al-Zawarhi was wanted in Egypt.

Saddam on the other hand harbored international terroorists Abdul Nidan and Abu Abbas. And he also had Mohamed Atta and another terrorist bomber in Iraq within60 days of 9-11. What were they doing there? They were Saudi not Iraqi? Were they training on Saddam's personal Boeing Airliner to learn to operate the airplanes (Flight Management System)? Then you have Saddam gasing over 50,000 of his people and gasing over 100,000 Iranians during the Iran -Iraq war. The point is : He was the biggest Arab bully and he supported the terrorists with training facilities and money. So we took him out! Just like we took out 90% of Al-Qadea. And note we are fighting daintily. We are not carpet bombing vast areas into dust. And we are not targeting civilians. But Al-Qadea is targeting civilians, including other Muslims and women and children.

Personally, I think we should target the Anbar province, and carpet bomb it into dust. The Suni's can't support Saddam and fight a civil war if they do not exist. They have an opportunity to become part of the official government, but if they chose instead not to do so and continue the insurgency, well that is their choice! We need to make it a fatal one for them, then leave.

Note : Only the left wing media is naysayers on this war. The TV is not the real American public.

The majority of the American public really backs President Bush.
What the people do not like is our caution and this dainty war.
They think that instead of this war to liberate we should instead fight a war to annihilate, like we did with Hitler and the Japs in WWII.

Answer 5

Ferd. you're particularly excelling at shallow questioning. In WW2 a handful of persons knew approximately nukes. Even Truman did no longer understand approximately them till he grew to alter into president. there became 0 history of Atomic weaponry at that factor. No understanding of effects / long term impact. All Truman knew became that it became a huge bomb that would get even for the unprovoked eastern attack on Pearl Harbor and it may keep 1000's of 1000's of yankee stay via warding off invading mainland Japan. And it worked. conflict over. the version is that we've had 70 years to learn them and rfile them and learn them with the aid of fact they have been got here across and making use of one with that gained understanding would particularly be insane. i've got little doubt that NK would use one if it have been dropping a conflict. And, i've got little doubt that Iran would furnish them to terrorists. i've got additionally little doubt that if the two used one and the fissile textile have been traced lower back to the two usa that those international places would be obliterated

Answer 6

No. I think that the U.S. will simply work to undo the mistake that they made in 1978.

As for "Why US does not let people of other countries live their own ways?" Because in an increasing number of cases, living "their own ways" involves the orchestrated mass murder of Americans and others, including thousands of innocent Muslims.

Your question might be more useful if it were asked to those who refuse to allow Americans (and others) from living "their own way."

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamofascist

Answer 7

I don't believe so. Iraq was weak after first and second gulf wars. Iran had been nothing but stronger since 80-88 war.
in the other hand, US broke its teeth in Iraq. Can't offord another war. where will they get troops from? mexico?

Answer 8

The US will let Iran alone, as SOON as they stop pursuing nuclear technology. That is a blatant violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. And it's NOT just the US that has a problem with it.

Answer 9

last time I checked akmed those people from other countries bombed one of our cities. NOW there is a price that must be paid.

Answer 10

Certainly they repeat the mistake. Their history says that.