English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.infowars.com/saved%20pages/Prior_Knowledge/Clinton_let_bin_laden.htm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/sudan_offered_to_arrest_bin_laden.html

2006-11-03 20:24:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Please. And Bush was not a chickenhawk? Gimme a break. 9/11 happened on bush's watch. Even the 9/11 comission said so. And he STILL hasn't got bin Laden. In fact, i heard Bin Laden is chillin' in New orleans. Cuz we ALL know that no republicans will go THERE! HA!

2006-11-03 20:28:50 · answer #1 · answered by kevo 2 · 3 2

Because he was a republican, just pretending to be a democrat, and he is one of bush's skull and bones buddies.. They needed a war to keep people from talking about real issues, that way they would go along with the right wing extremist's agenda.. Look at clintons unfair trade policies and his give away of our news media to 6 corporations, how can anyone honestly say that he was a democrat?.. Then there was his disgrace of office(another con job).. Bush and clinton belong to the same right wing extremist group and "we've all been had".. Shouldn't you admit that the republicans party is too far gone to be fixed?.. Who do you think will pay for their massive deficit?.

2006-11-04 04:45:44 · answer #2 · answered by david n 3 · 1 1

Didn't all Americans ignore the crisis in Iraq because of that Lewinsky thing?

C'mon, if American are gonna get anywhere, they need unity.

I don't see how Bush did anything much differently than Clinton, other than letting him go AFTER he attacked the US.

Quit trying to find someone to blame. It caught the whole world off guard.

P.S. Amazing how often September 11, 2001 is brought up, but no one speaks about Hurricane Katrina....

2006-11-04 04:39:42 · answer #3 · answered by mithril 6 · 0 2

Hey, I'm always up for some Clinton bashing, but I can't get behind your links.

Even though I know Sudan offered up OBL twice in 96.
Still, those links are shady.

2006-11-04 04:45:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

In order to give an answer based in fact, the question has to be based in fact too. Actually there is not a factual point in your question!

2006-11-04 05:13:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0 0

Always ironic that someone would call Clinton those names when they really belong to the Christofascist GW. Our very first crackhead Prez. Rock on GW.

2006-11-04 05:06:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Didn't Bush join the national guard so he wouldn't have to go to Viet Nam? He's a real hero too.

2006-11-04 04:47:31 · answer #7 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 3 3

Why don't you actually get get real, and shut up!!!

Your not asking a question based on any truth, or fact ......... so how can you get any real honest answer!? you can't.

Educate yourself A LOT more!!

2006-11-04 04:33:33 · answer #8 · answered by Blondie* 4 · 3 2

He ignored the crisis in Iraq in exchange with his philadering with Lewinsky.

2006-11-04 04:30:25 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 4

He was too busy shoving a cigar in "that woman"

2006-11-04 04:36:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers