For the others who wrote asking for details:
Anyone who remembers anything about World War II, or has studied anything about World War II, will understand and remember that during that war the Japanese developed a way to demoralize the American forces. The Japanese psychological warfare experts developed a message they felt would work.
They gave their psychological warfare script to their famous broadcaster, "Tokyo Rose," and every day she would broadcast their message packaged in different ways, hoping it would have a negative impact on American GI's morale.
What was that demoralizing message?
It had three main points:
1.. Your President is lying to you.
2.. This war is illegal.
3.. You cannot win the war.
Does this sound familiar??? Is it because of:
a.. Tokyo Hillary,
Tokyo Harry,
Tokyo Teddy
Tokyo Nancy,
Tokyo Durbin,
Tokyo Kerry, who have all learned from the former enemies of our country, and have picked up the same message and are broadcasting it on:
b.. Tokyo CNN,
Tokyo ABC,
Tokyo CBS,
Tokyo NBC?
The only difference is that they claim to support our troops...before they demoralize them. Come to think of it...Tokyo Rose told the American Troops she was on their side, also!
2006-11-03 20:30:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
What he said is true the armed forces have lowered their educational standards substantially to meet need for additional manpower. When I joined the army you could not get in if you had any kind of criminal record, or did not have a high school diploma. This is not true as of today if you don't believe me just look around the armed forces have lowered the standard officially since 2003. As far as a liberal agenda that is such a tired proclamation, for 1 second look at the military records of the super tough conservatives. Bush and his phantom air guard service and Rummy and Cheney they were too busy to go when it was their time to serve, so Kerry a decorated veteran against those cowards he has earned a right to speak.
By the way how can you be a Native American white???
2006-11-04 04:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Frank R 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have really been on the political 24/7 the past year keeping up.It wasn,t the right time, but here is the meaning If you work hard[that's the American dream] you can be anything you want but that dream has been massacred in the past years, economy stinks people no health care benefits gone all that is left is ending up with the mess we have in Irag. It was a definite rye joke a slam at Bush, although true it was bad timing and not explained. Whether we believe in this war or not democrat or republican prays these young men and women will come home safe and sound., and no one would ever say anything bad about these brave men or women. I sit with the constitution here government law books and believe me I could take you thru so many horrible corrupt things that have taken place in.. the past years it would make you sick
2006-11-04 03:08:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by dinah.thompson@sbcglobal.net 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am an independent but the Liberals yes, Democrats no. There is a large difference anymore between a Democrat and a Liberal. They should seperate the parties so that Democrats can actually have a candidate in the running.
2006-11-04 03:33:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
John Kerry started showing his low regard for our troops in 1971. He has never stopped.
He himself is a low down liar nobody wins 3 purple hearts a bronze and 2 silver stars by being in combat only 90 days. Of course it helped that he was the one recommending himself for these heroic medals.
Maybe that is why he so readily through them away during one of the anti-Vietnam rallies he attended.
2006-11-04 06:36:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not true...democrat and republican have similar respect for military. John Kerry's comments do not represent others views. Just have day to day conversations with ordinary people about military and ask if they are democrats or republicans...almost all will support the enlisted. I think that is one thing we learned after Vietnam.
2006-11-04 02:54:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by hearts_and_thoughts_2003 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think that John Kerry Represent the true liberal agenda as much as Foley's action represent the republican agenda. Don't judge the whole be the actions or words of two!
2006-11-04 02:53:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
No. I dont!!!
I think your representing the true NEO CON agenda with this stupid, pathetic, last minute desperate attempt to bad mouth and spin that in hopes of what?? People actually to believe that ridiculous more of the same rederick, propoganda that an Independent like myself can expect a Republican Conservative like yourself to say!!
That crap has never worked and honestly .....your doing yourself, and your party more harm than good!!!
Why dont you actually try talking about the REAL ISSUES that plague this Country!! That would be a good start!!!
2006-11-04 03:27:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Blondie* 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
No. Kerry was a decorated war hero. He won three purple hearts, and a bronze star. Bush served two months in the national guard, before his father got him into Harvard.
2006-11-04 03:33:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Prince C 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Mark Foley doesn't represent all Republicans, but John Commie Kerry represents just about all inside the Beltway Democrats I know.
2006-11-04 02:39:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋