2006-11-03 17:11:27 · 12 answers · asked by mythofpegasus 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is a hypocrite, who said we were at "war" with evil doers, so when we invaded Iraq, which was peaceful towards us, he said we were at "war" with evil doers who were drawn to Iraq to rid that area of our invaders.. Yes, he said we were at war, but never with Iraq, and yet when the widows and families of our wounded and dead speak, they say their loved ones died fighting in the "war" in Iraq..
Read Animal Farm by George Orwell, if you want to see what Bush is doing..
Karl Rove has read it and mastered it and we are the animals being manipulated and Rove and Bush and Cheney are the Pigs running the farm, for our own good.
2006-11-03 17:16:45 · answer #1 · answered by Golfcarmel 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
George Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq to get their oil in the guise of searching for weapons of mass destruction.
2006-11-03 20:59:28 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WAR yes!
Lets see Saddam Hussein did not abide the sanctions placed upon him by the UN sercuity council for 12 years. Maybe we should have just sat down and had tea over a game of bridge and talked it out. Maybe we should just talk to N. Korea, beings they just test fired a nuke and have a problem with proliferation. Then we can talk to Iran, beings they just test fired 3 missles that they got the technology from eho else? N. Korea
2006-11-03 17:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The surge did no longer wok the two as in attaining the political objectives that have been set out until eventually now it began. asserting the surge a fulfillment is an occasion of changing objectives downward and then claiming fulfillment. "the secret to the meant fulfillment of the surge is undeniable to make certain. in case you kill over a million human beings, wound and maim possibly three times that many, turn 5 million greater into exiles or refugees of their own land, around up tens of 1000's of the greater youthful adult men who've survived this slaughter and imprison them without rates in detention camps, this is a threat to attain a brief suppression of commonplace resistance. The “own characteristics� of George W. Bush that geared up him to preside over the form of undertaking are gross lack of awareness, sadism, an unflinching dedication to the hobbies of the economic aristocracy into which he replaced into born, and an absolute contempt for the suffering of working human beings. he's, in short, a psychological cipher and a ethical cripple. little doubt from Berlin in 1939 the Nazi “surge� into Poland additionally regarded a great fulfillment, accomplished via comparable procedures, and there have been many that attributed this to the “own characteristics,� which contain the stubbornness and self-self belief, of Germany’s Führer. For the hundreds of thousands upon hundreds of thousands of persons interior the U. S. and around the globe who've destructive the U. S. intervention in Iraq from the outset, the situation replaced into no longer regardless of if mass killing and the systematic destruction of a society might “artwork,� yet particularly opposition to a criminal conflict of aggression."
2016-10-15 08:53:26 · answer #4 · answered by pavolini 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did Kerry call troops in Iraq stupid?
2006-11-03 17:32:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows with Bush...
2006-11-03 17:18:03 · answer #6 · answered by one 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2006-11-03 17:16:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he called it Mission Accomplished
2006-11-03 17:16:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wasn't he calling it "operation Iraqi freedom" or something totally ridiculous like that?
2006-11-03 17:13:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well he didn't want to appear arrogant and call it a beat down.
2006-11-03 17:13:07 · answer #10 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋