English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6114458.stm

2006-11-03 16:35:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Lots of misconceptions on this subject. Let me try and clear up a few.

Bush ordered the release of these documents against the advice of John Negroponte. Senators Hoekstra and Roberts, both Republicans, wanted this information released to the public for political reasons to try and help their case that there were WMD in Iraq. According to David Kay, head weapons inspector, these were documents that were retrieved prior to 1991 and were already known about before W invaded Iraq.

Second year nuclear physics majors do not have all the information needed to build a nuclear bomb, let alone a regular physics major. This information was not previously available on the internet, that is an urban myth.

There is no doubt that Saddam was a future threat, but there is still no evidence that he was an imminent threat.

These are the facts.

2006-11-03 17:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by Believe in Possibilities 4 · 1 2

Bush is a terrorist, Rumsfeld is a war criminal and the American Generals should hang their heads in shame for the human rights abuses they perpetuate at at Guantanamo Bay. ...full stop.

Usual stuff, American Leaders hang the blame on the junior officers, because under all those ribbons and medals they are cowards, abusers, and human rights violators. Think Calley ( Mei Li) and the corporals at Abu Graib,.

If America believes its Generals are so far removed that they dont know what their soldiers are up to then they are grossly unfit to hold that Rank, likewise if they did know then they are also unfit , either way the buck has to stop at the top.

2006-11-03 17:02:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No, the terrorists have multiple sources to that type of information.

Are you suggesting the government censor any document, book, or video with questionable content? How conservative of you.

The liberals, while crying out for more transparency in all government affairs, are now seeing the fallacy of it.

2006-11-04 00:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by ©2009 7 · 1 1

Yep, he is. I don't know why he caved in to republican pressure.

But maybe you should be less bias on this. By having such documents (and more as is stated in the other article I read), this shows that what is found in Iraq can not all be revealed to the public. Just like I have been saying all along

2006-11-03 16:48:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

yes, Bush signed a bill to allow the national security "how to build a nuclear bomb" on the Internet despite the objections of National Security, Nigraponte,, Bush has given the enemy the access to how to kill us,, he must be on the side of the terrorists.

2006-11-03 17:15:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

By latest count there are several million people that have knowledge of how to build nuclear weapons, thousands of unclassified research resources including books, website etc. I don't think terrorists learned anything they don't already have access to. The real issue is controlling access to the materials.

2006-11-03 16:43:46 · answer #6 · answered by Fork Canada 3 · 3 3

Bush is helping the terrorist by not supporting the troops.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/03/rumsfeld.resign/index.html



Fire Rumsfeld now!

2006-11-03 16:57:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

John F.Kerry is helping the terrorists as he helped the North Vietnamese win against America ( for which he is honored today in Ho Cho Minh City ) by giving aid and comfort to the enemy .
What happened , did you run out of conspiracies ?

2006-11-03 16:46:48 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1 4

Bush keeps on getting stupider and stupider. There could be terrorists right now looking at it and giggling.

2006-11-03 16:42:45 · answer #9 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 4 2

No. Any second year physics students had that information.

It was an error. Besides:

How can you consider it giving information TO the terrorists when it was received FROM the terrorists?

2006-11-03 16:40:28 · answer #10 · answered by freebird 6 · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers