Sorry to hear about your loss. I'm glad that you are prepared to listen to our opinons on the matter. If enough people research it, maybe we can stop the bloody bath that is taking place in Iraq, in the name of defending our country.
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg
EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM
Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329
TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=
MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA
2006-11-03 23:06:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joe_Pardy 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush was on television at the time he was notified of the attack. Would any person in his right mind just keep on with the masquerade if he didn't know before hand that it was going to happen. I could go on and on about the 9/11 myth, but please read the book "The New Pearl Harbor" and decide for yourself who was behind the cover up of the attack and why it happened. One fact I would like to point out is, how does a building that tall collapse in 9 seconds when all the laws of physics say it should have taken over one minute of floor to floor impact unless the building was imploded and it fell in free fall form like was the case. E-mail me if you want to discuss further. It is very hard to believe a president would allow 3000 of it's own people to die in order to justify a war for oil and big business interests.
2006-11-03 14:46:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! Absolutely not!. It would be stupid to think otherwise. I know that the liberals want people to think that Mr. Bush is an idiot, but an idiot would not have been able to become president, or an air force fighter pilot, or governor of Texas. The liberals are lying, plain and simple. Do you really think that he would allow the murder of all of those people? And do you actually think that he would be walking around free if he had?
I am sorry for your loss. But please, think for yourself. Do not let others do it for you. The Democratic party in the US has become vindictive and hatred runs rampant in the party. I am ashamed of them as an American. Have you heard any Republicans make the kind of accusations that the Democrats have? I am sick of both parties myself. I think that we need to come back to center on all issues. The Republicans are too far right, and the Democrats are too far left. And you and I are caught in the middle, but No, The President did not know. But, think about this, since the 911 attacks Briton, Spain, and even Russia have been hit by Muslim fanatics again. But the USA has not been. This is due to the efforts of George Bush. He broke down the barriers that kept the FBI and the CIA from stopping the first attacks. He found out what the trouble was and he fixed it.
He should be commended, not despised.
God bless you and yours. Again, I am sorry for your loss.
2006-11-03 14:42:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
massive ameliorations good right here. Bush did no longer reason 9/11, Obama did reason his 9/11 by skill of utilising actuality he supported an islamic revolution over a mundane government that hasn't accomplished something thinking the reality that Reagan bombed Khadafy and close him up for 25 yrs. Plus he refused to allow our threat-unfastened practices forces to be heavily armed or in numbers that would enable them to guard the compound from yet yet another Iranian hostage disaster or what got here approximately subsequently.
2016-11-27 02:06:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, we officially heard it all when Condoleeza Rice stood in front of the 9/11 commission and was confronted with the memo entitled "Bin Laden set to attack within the US" just a few weeks before the attack and SURPRISE, she didn't recall. Yes, this adminstration was warned before hand yet denies it when all of the proof is right there and thinks the public is too stupid to realize that something could have been done to prevent these attacks.
2006-11-03 15:05:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rexy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not personally. He was still trying to get oriented and work on the agenda upon which he was elected.
But one FBI agent did believe that an attack was imminent but could not get anyone to listen and respond. Clinton's administration put a wall between the CIA and FBI which prevented them from sharing information. This agent said in a letter to his superiors that Arabs were in this country learning to fly commercial airliners and was suspicious that they would be used in an attack on the U.S. What is ridiculous is that the woman on the 9/11 Commission (don't remember her name) is the ONE who put the "no sharing" rule into effect, yet she's one of those looking for answers of what went wrong. Funny, that didn't cross her mind as being THE problem.
2006-11-03 14:29:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Farbles 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
NO, I think the Clinton administration did a darn good job of shoving what info they had on Al-Quaida under the rug - thereby leaving the new president seemingly caught off guard.
Bush has handled the situation as well as can be expected...although I must say I was more impressed with his initial actions and reactions than I've been lately watching our troops linger uneffectively in Iraq.
2006-11-03 14:31:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Melis__A 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
First of all, I am very sorry for your loss, that being said, I HATE "W", but I don't really think that he knew 9/11 was going to happen. I am curious however, as to why he let the Bin Laden family leave the USA while all other planes were being grounded? They should have been interrogated, maybe we wouldn't have lost so many precious lives in Iraq as well as the Trade Centers.
2006-11-03 14:35:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Let there be an independent commission of prominent Americans to solve this mystery once for all,this thing is taking a toll on the fabric of the Nation.
2006-11-03 15:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a possiblitly that he knew about it though chances are he didn't, but to say we preformed the act (which you're not) would be ludacris since the government fails miserably most everything it attempts to accomplish; while it's obvious we caused it.
I'm sorry to hear you lost a family member to that nightmare.
2006-11-03 14:26:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by italian_eyelashes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋