Rudi Johnson for Darrell Jackson?

Question

My roster is as follows(I am in a 14 team league and have managed my butt off to get this team)

QB, TE, K, DT- doesn't really matter

RB - Ahman, Rudi, Clinton, Lundy
WR - T.O., Javon, Joe Horn, and Keenan McCardell


We can start 2-3 RB's and 2-3 WR's, total of 5

I am stoked to have three RB's I can start and interchange every week with the four that I have and have just been starting T.O. and Javon since I only need to start 2 WR's if I start 3 RB's. My thought process is that Darrel Jackson's schedule is cake for the rest of the season(even with his injury and no Hasselbeck). And while Rudi will be pounding the rock as it gets colder he still has to play the Ravens twice among other good defenses.

If I do the trade, I guess I could still start 3 RB's but I think I would go with 2 RB's and keep T.O., Javon, and Darrell, but what would be the point of me trading then?

Any suggestions?

Answer 1

Darrel Jackson isn't flashy, but he's all Seattle has right now, not to mention the fact he's a very consistant fantasy guy every week. I would expect him to get a lot of looks this week, while Rudi continues to struggle with the rest of the Cinci offense. Yards in the air always come easier than yards on the ground.

Answer 2

This is tough, not knowing how your league scores the points.
In my league decent RBs average more points than decent WRs.
I've got D. Jackson and he down 30pts to my 4th RB (W. Parker).
I think you are better off keeping Rudi, especially when you consider the QB situation in Seattle right now. The only WR I would say yes to without hesitation would be Colston and only if he is TE eligible in your league.

Answer 3

Just gave Rudi for Vick. Rudi's next defensive match ups are potential for low points and Chris Perry may be taking more red zone carries.

Answer 4

keep playing rudi if darrel doensnt have anyone to throw 2 him