As usual, you are lying. Foley never touched anyone under age. As for the evangelist, where is your proof? I thought liberals like you are for innocent until proven guilty. You make me sick.
2006-11-03 13:37:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
If the democrats are the majority, the repuclicans would no need to vote that way to have it come to pass:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::In 1990, PPelosi voted three times to make a convicted page sexual predator,
former Congressman Gerry Studds (D-Mass.), chair of a congressional committee.
elosi voted against censuring Barney Frank for having his live-in boyfriend
run a prostitution ring from Frank's apartment.
Pelosi raised no objections when Clinton pardoned Democrat Congressman Mel Reynolds (Ill.)
who had been convicted of felonies for having had sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker.
The historic Nancy Pelosi is an authentic representative of San Francisco liberal values and hardly
has the record to lecture anyone on cleaning up the Congress.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
2006-11-03 22:06:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
At least we got rid of Foley, who didn't even break the law & good riddance.
The demohypocrites kept Gerry Studds. He did more than email, he did it all and did break the law. The demopukes re--elected him. Now his boyfriend wants his retirement.
Barney ran the whore-house, yet he's a respected demo. Says a lot.
2006-11-03 21:47:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by RockHunter 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Perhaps we should let the democrats give them a parade and applaud them for "coming out." Grow up and do your research before asking another idiotic question.
2006-11-03 21:39:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Emm 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ask Barney Franks in Massachusetts! Wow, the same state were Kerry is Senator!
2006-11-03 21:37:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sentinel 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Wow, you are in denial, talk about "Passin the Buck".....Hmmm, AND, this isnt the first time you posted a question regarding prostitutes, are you trying to tell us something........ Must be moonlighting, ......
2006-11-04 13:03:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Delia 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Thats a lib issue all the way.
2006-11-03 21:41:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am surprised Yahoo would allow such a moronic question.
2006-11-03 21:38:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
that describes half the Democratic party, doesn't it?
2006-11-03 21:41:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by klarf 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
yep, and to keep you safe at night from terrorists
2006-11-03 21:37:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋