no they just buy it and throw it away together... HAHAHA..
then they get massages..
2006-11-03 13:49:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO. Libel regulations require that the fact is an untrue certainty and be unfavorable, and likewise with public determine there must be a exhibiting of relatively malice and reason to harm. additionally any style of political opinion is exempt, (until eventually Bush destroys the 1st exchange) additionally it must be in writing to be libel, yet possibly you meant slander. additionally it must be understood on the time to be a announcement of an untrue certainty.Mere implications from submit fact habit is beside the point. Haggard replaced into no longer outed yet, so there replaced into no possibility that he could be misunderstood on the time. no longer something incorrect with asserting that approximately automobiles and so forth. regardless of if, if he now suggested that "Bush is a mendacity hypocritical druggie gay adulterer. like me". it would be slander( except genuine) yet human beings like Bush are in a incredibly visable public profession and that's almost impossible for them to win a slander experience because of the fact their place makes statements against them quite often exempt. they should show relatively malice. If he sued for slander. it would basically provide greater exposure to the accusation and be worse. because of the fact of this public figures seldom difficulty to sue every person for this. It brings up all varieties of characater themes in courtroom and the sufferer has to testify and be examined unmercifully via the defendnats criminal professional approximately evreything under the sunlight.he ought to respond to under penalty of perjury. are you able to think of if he replaced into asked if he ever took meth? if he lied he might get impeached for mendacity under oath. ( in a honest worldwide) if he admitted it, he might go through different effects. so maximum suitable to close up and not sue approximately it. so in case you prefer to slander the Pres, be at liberty, yet beware his assaults on freedom of speech. he ought to rearrange for Cheny to shoot you interior the face with a shotgun.
2016-10-15 08:44:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you think they share prostitutes...(masseuses)? As anyone noticed that the GOP and religious leadership is controlled by a bunch pervert drug addicts?
2006-11-03 14:17:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by HawkEye 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, I don't but I do think it is possible that Hillary and Nancy have some risque sessions together.
2006-11-03 14:09:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
since it is public knowledge George had a coke habit once
this sort of thing would not surprise me ..now prove it!
2006-11-03 13:44:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No more than once a week.
Jesus is the reason for the homosexual pleasin'.
2006-11-03 13:44:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Good Times, Happy Times... 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am surprised that Yahoo is allowing such moronic questions!
2006-11-03 13:37:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by daydoom 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO, their addiction is stupidity
2006-11-03 13:41:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by razor 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope not
2006-11-03 14:20:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. And neither do you.
2006-11-03 13:42:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋