Do you think Saddam Hussein should get the death penalty?

Answer 1

Hell Yeah!

Answer 2

do you seriously think that a death by hanging is a humane way for someone to die? some of these answers are just spouting out rubbish- Saddam Hussein is an evil man, i agree, but what was his major crime? Killing and torturing thousands of his own people. we are all being extremely hypocritical- 'Hussein killed loads of people so we should kill him.' We are lowering ourselves to his level- some people are even calling for a public hanging. what could be more grotesque? Of course, no one in my family was tortured, killed or raped under his regime, but i turn to the example of the Amish community. Little girls were lined up in a school house and shot by a crazed gunman, who then shot himself. There was a photo in the newspaper a few days later, of some women from the town at a funeral, weeping. I assumed that they were at the girls' funeral, but as i read on i discovered it was the gunman's. Those people found it in their hearts to forgive- and we should to. Murder is never the answer- Saddam Hussein should be jailed for life- with absolutely no chance of parole, but death is a disgusting and brutal way to end this sad and sorry state of affairs.

Answer 3

enable's ask a Kurd what they think of. On March sixteen, 1988, the Kurdish city of Halabja replaced into attacked with a mix of mustard gas and nerve brokers, killing 5,000 civilians, and maiming, disfiguring, or heavily debilitating 10,000 greater. (see Halabja poison gas attack) [14]. The attack got here approximately alongside side the 1988 al-Anfal marketing campaign designed to reassert powerful administration of the quite often Kurdish inhabitants of things of northern Iraq and defeat the Kurdish peshmerga insurrection forces. the united states now keeps that Saddam ordered the attack to terrorize the Kurdish inhabitants in northern Iraq ([15]), yet Saddam's regime claimed on the time that Iran replaced into responsible for the attack[9] and the U. S. supported the declare until eventually the early Nineteen Nineties.

Answer 4

I'm with Piddi up there. He should get a lifetime of solitary AFTER all the other convicts are bored with abusing him.
If they kill him, it will make him a flippin martyr, which is what he wants. Plus, killing him would release his evil soul to do more negative evil, so, like Manson, he'd better be kept alive for as long as possible.
As for bush, he's done some bad stuff, but he hasn't buried cities full of people alive. If he has, the same goes for him.

Answer 5

Why? For Killing and torturing innocent Iraqis? If Saddam should get death, then so should Bush.

Answer 6

No!! and i have perfectly good reason for that. he should suffer and not die. he should know how it feels to get tourchered. he HAS to suffer. he has killed so many people and just by getting a death penalty wont help. he should really know how it feels to be tourchered!

Answer 7

Is that going to bring back the 2,500+ soldiers that have died in Iraq, since the start of "The War"?

Answer 8

SHOULD BUSH BE TRIED FOR THE SAME OFFENSE AND GET THE DEATH PENALTY?
50,000 IRAQI'S DEAD AND OVER 28OO GI'S.

WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.

ONE SHOULD TAKE CARE WHEN THROWING BRICKS.

Answer 9

Yes, and the day he's executed we should start pulling out our troops. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! And good riddance to Iraq and the entire Middle East.

Answer 10

yes!!! a slow good death maybe burned and then thorwn off a bridge...wow i sound harsh

Answer 11

I think he should suffer, and die of a slow death!