Do you live in a county were one of these guys (and one woman) is running for re-election? (The reason is usually unmitigated corruption.)
1. DENNIS HASTERT (R-ILL.)
2. JAMES SENSENBRENNER JR. (R-WIS.)
3. DON YOUNG (R-ALASKA)
4. WILLIAM JEFFERSON (D-LA.)
5. JERRY LEWIS (R-CALIF.)
6. TOM TANCREDO (R-COLO.)
7. DICK POMBO (R-CALIF.)
8. CURT WELDON (R-PA.)
9. HAL ROGERS (R-KY.)
10. MARILYN MUSGRAVE (R-COLO.)
Read the article (click the page number for your congressman):
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12054520/the_10_worst_congressmen/
2006-11-03 13:22:14 · 10 answers · asked by c_sense_101 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey wait a second... I'm a far left democrat but Tancredo is awesome.
2006-11-03 13:29:07 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A democrat. The Rolling Stone must not be a left-wing leaning magazine.
2006-11-03 13:29:55 · answer #2 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
over 23% of the united state inhabitants strongly have faith that one and all illegals must be deported. Tom Tancredo is the sole congressman demanding on illegals. i might vote for him for president and if he have been in texas or new mexico we'd have much less illegals.
2016-12-28 12:13:32 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rolling Stone is Liberal, of course, but they are not known for lying. What they have reported is what is wrong with our government. If half of what they wrote was true, it would be awful....GREAT SITE, THANK YOU...READ EVERY WORD AND BELIEVE WHAT THEY SAID...ROLLING STONE IS NOT THE ONLY PUBLICATION TO SAY THESE THINGS.
2006-11-03 13:46:04 · answer #4 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Even I were in 1 of these districts I wouldn't put too much stock in the political opinions of Rolling Stoned.
2006-11-03 13:29:03 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's a good read, but I agree Rolling Stone is a bit biased.
2006-11-03 13:30:22 · answer #6 · answered by J G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO CLAY SHAW of Ft Laderdale is not but should be, He has not one accomplishment! only following Rebuplican authority. I don't know why people keep voting for that blood sucker!!
2006-11-03 13:53:03 · answer #7 · answered by razor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Rolling Stone listed them as "worst," they probably deserve to be reelected more than any in Washington!
2006-11-03 13:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by Eric 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You have to be stoned to read the Rolling Stone!!!!!
2006-11-03 13:30:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
they threw in a democrat to show they are not bias.
2006-11-03 13:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋