I know Hindu`s in India have castes but thats from relegion, and i don`t mean where your low class by being poor but if you got rich you would be better class, i mean like here where your more or less stuck in the class your born into.
2006-11-03
12:07:05
·
10 answers
·
asked by
keny
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
what i realy meant is for example im council estate working class if i won the lottery i wouldnt really fit in anywhere once you get with people outside you own class it feels awkward and money or no money upper class people would spot me a mile of as riff raff theres no common ground not that i`m unhappy about it just curious
2006-11-03
13:23:01 ·
update #1
It's not really like that in the UK. Just because you aren't royalty doesn't mean you can't succeed. It's not as big of a deal as it was a couple of centuries ago. Commoners can receive titles also.
2006-11-03 12:09:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by arbolito 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Due that my father was a diplomat I had the opportunity of visiting and living in various countries and I can tell you that all countries have a class systems for one reason or other, name, titles, birth, race, money, power, knowledge, etc. etc.
Not even 80 years of Communism in Soviet Russia were able to eliminate class differences.
There was the privileged class in power (called the Nomenclature) and the rest of the country.
2006-11-03 12:23:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
O sure, contained in the U.ok. that is nonetheless 'them' and 'us'. you're both of their clique or you at the instantaneous are not. I have particularly a sturdy close by accent and that i encounter it very puzzling to have a communication with someone who speaks 'particularly grandly'. i'm not in any respect particular if that makes them higher class or that mummy and daddy might want to arise with the money for elocution instructions yet they make it particularly sparkling (on listening to my accent) that we've not something in difficulty-loose and, subsequently, do not want to communicate with me. this would make lengthy prepare journeys very boring and, even, uncomfortable. in the adventure that they were as grand as they warfare to represent they are they must have had a seat in excellent i.m.o. i in my opinion travelled in excellent once because the seat I had booked (and had evidence of) had not been reserved for me so i became 'upgraded' (Oh, what a take care of - sarcasm meant). i became there for 4 hours and it became hilarious. I must have written a e book about it after I were given abode. i in my opinion experience quite sorry for persons like that because they must have an extremely narrow circle of 'acquaintances' and that i doubt if lots of those human beings will be genuine acquaintances. 'acquaintances' in such circles are in basic terms acquaintances till their usefulness expires. operating class human beings in a lot of situations proceed to be acquaintances for existence and help one yet another, for the sake of the different human being, not for the perks which come from having 'helped'.
2016-12-05 12:35:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosenberger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
An easier question would be, are there any countries that DON'T have a class system?
And don't even think of mentioning the USA, because they have a doozy one (though heavily denied!)
2006-11-03 12:17:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How about Saudi Arabia, or South Africa, the rich poor divide is much worse than the Brits.
2006-11-03 12:09:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by jimbo_thedude 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Every country that England ruled has a class system and there are many.
2006-11-03 12:08:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
India, big time! and a few arab countries, and some african.
Its refered to as Caste.
2006-11-03 12:15:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ben b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
indias lowest caste was. and im not asure if still is?. the untouchables. a 'low' caste who were literaly, verbologically ~{wahoo new word} untouchable because of there 'status'
2006-11-03 12:26:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
most do, to some extent or another. some are more rigid than others.
2006-11-03 12:08:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sure there are!
2006-11-03 12:07:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋