Who is the worse president in US history?

Question

Name one and add second worse. Is ok to name father and son

Answer 1

Definitely George W. Bush, followed closely by Ronald Reagan

Answer 2

i think of it relatively is ridiculous to declare Bush replaced into the worst or Obama replaced into the worst. all of us is basically asserting that because of the fact they not often remember greater suitable than 3-5 presidents because of the fact they're so youthful. until eventually now asserting who's the best-ever worst or the main suitable, you need to truly study each and every of the presidents u . s . a . has had. What did they do, what befell in the time of their presidency, how a lot the persons enjoyed/hated him....in case you basically do a survey and ask human beings "who do you think of is the worst US president ever"? human beings will say Bush, Obama, Reagan, Carter, Bush sr.....you realize the main up-tp-date ones.

Answer 3

The worst President in US history according to a composite rating
is Warren Harding, based on Wikipedia's rating. I find it strange
Bill Clinton and Dubya are #21 and #22, or virtually tied.

Answer 4

Andrew Jackson,he was impeached.And his power taken away by the congress.In the early 1800's
Richard M.Nixon, was involved in the Watergate!

Answer 5

Jimmy Carter was a really nice guy with nothing but good intentions but hes really screwed up the economy ( 20% mortgage rates ! ) and had really limp wristed defense and foreign policy

Answer 6

Jimmy Carter or Herbert Hoover.

Answer 7

George W. Bush.
Richard Nixon.

Answer 8

Bush Jr, and Nixon

Answer 9

Is means that you are referring to those who are presidents.
Thats a very small set. Is it 5 living presidents right now?

Your question should read:
Who were the worst presidents in US history?

Worst is qualitative, and very very fuzzy. Are you asking if I have a personal grudge? Are you asking about the quality of their fiscal policy? Are you asking how good of a husband they were to their wife, or how good of a father they were to their kids. Its a fuzzy question, and you dont qualify what area worst is about.

If I just answer because of a grude, thats the stupidest thing I could do. It means that I didnt give your question any thought. It showed that I will spout an opinion without thought. It means that whatever my internal economy may be, any negative emotion I have can drown it from my mind. It says terrible things about me a human being. Is this an exercise in mob-mentality?

To answer your question, Im not that old, so most of what I know about presidents comes from 2 living presidents, and from history books that I barely remember. I cant give any significant opinion on most of them.

I like President Bush because I have watched him like a hawk since his first day in office, and what he does shows excellent character. People can argue about what was known or not, but I want the kind of president who will do the best he can with what he has. I think he has courage.
I remember his first stem cell decision, and I think it was beautiful, not because of my personal opinions about pro or anti. I think that he made a decision that met the stated goals and values of two nearly impossibly irreconcilable parties, and was willing to do it knowing they both were walking away from the table mad at him. Thats integrity. He served others in a insightful, almost beautiful compromise, when it cost him. I admire that.

Our situation in Iraq is tough. I dont argue that, but two things keep me from equating it with the president. The world situation is not the person of President Bush, the person is not the same as the events especially things as grossly out of his control as behaviors of entire civilizations in conflict. On the middle eastern street, the american weak response of "why" and "Im sorry to anyone I offended" is taken as a tacit admission of guilt. His hard line approach is the best approach, and the world knows that if you want to nuke us we arent going to roll over and take it. God willing we will rain the fourth of july on your head. If we had not rained down the fourth of july, I am convinced that it would have been a terrorist incentive 1000x larger than the mess in Iraq is now. Now, six years later, we could look back at the twin towers as small, in terms of terrorist attacks. I think taking it to them, keeping the bombs in their home-towns was the single best idea available.

Worst? I think that Mr. Clinton did more to destroy marriage than any other president in history. He popularized contraceptives among teens, and shamed his own office and marriage because he couldnt keep his own penis in his pants. I think the foundation of the country is marriage. I think that to treat human beings like a plague of locusts that must be contained, or like the animals we breed, butcher, and eat is degrading, and thats the fundamental mindset put out by the think tanks advising those families of policies. Wealth according to them is about things, and not about people. Its about what the old have, and not what the old give to their children.

Answer 10

historically james buchanan is considered poorly because he did nothing to prevent the civil war.

nixon was quite a failure.
bush jr., if this war fails he will get an enormous amount of blame for the war.