English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do you republicans believe so strongly about abortion, but are willing to let thousands die in Iraq. It had nothing to do with 9/11, bush himself admitted that. If u believe it's all about the evil things he saddam did to his people then why don't we go into North Korea, Darfur or even China for that matter. And to Lori G more people die in iraq than by abortion and if your a christian there is no such thing as an innocent life, the bible says we're all born into sin.

2006-11-03 10:08:13 · 19 answers · asked by imajiknation 2 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Iraqi people are less important and less valuable then unborn fetuses. It is okay to kill iraqi people.

2006-11-03 10:13:33 · answer #1 · answered by romulusnr 5 · 1 5

Before I even get started here, I am a pro-choice believer, now how can an abortion be worse than Iraq? Those kids over there are not fetus', they have lived and breathed and learned and are individuals, they have their own personalities and hopes and dreams, and I know an aborted child never got that chance to experience those things, but that is the choice of the parents and only the parents have that right to decide what the destiny is for their own child, no one else has that right, but with Iraq??? We are allowing thousands of our healthy young men and women to be butchered over there and for no reason, we have no business over there, we wouldn't like it if they came here and tried to force us to live like them, what gives us the right to go over there and force them to live like us???? They have lived they way they have since the beginning of Christ....who are we to change that? They don't want to change how they live, that's what they are used to and that's all they know. Yes, there are some that would like to see change, but that will never happen because there are too many that don't want to see change and are willing to keep fighting to keep things as they know them. This was never about the evil Saddam did, this was baby Bush cleaning up Daddy Bush's vendetta against Saddam. Daddy Bush couldn't get it done in '92 so Baby Bush had to do something to clean up what Daddy started. Abortion worse than Iraq? NOT A CHANCE!!!!!
By the way, my son is over there, for the second time and I'm not a very happy Mom about it either....

2006-11-03 10:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by robotchic 2 · 1 0

Reshape your thinking! I don't believe all republicans are anti-abortion. What about Schwarzenegger? He's Republican.

Watch the news... We went into Iraq for WMD and everyone knows that was a mistake!! EVERYONE!
But, it turned out to be the best place to fight the fanatical terrorists, Bush admitted that and so did osama.

And, it seems you don't know much about China, Africa or N. Korea either. N. Korea hasn't changed for over 50 years, Darfur should have be taken care of the UN chief Cofey Onan, and it would be a fools move to mess with China!

It's history, Saddam killed 300000 - 400000 humans. Probably more, nobody will ever know for sure.

2006-11-03 10:21:05 · answer #3 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 2 1

The child aborted does not get the chance to be born into sin so therefor is extremely innocent for one!! For two the people who serve our country are heroes in my book forever, But they volunteer to be in the military. And for going into the other countries to fight, honestly I don't know war is a very confusing thing. Though I do think we did the right thing in Iraq it was only a matter of time before that phsyco's 2 sons killed him and made things even worse.

2006-11-03 10:18:31 · answer #4 · answered by mommy 4 · 1 1

outdoors of the certainty that the Democrats (no seats are held via a Liberal occasion) have not had the capability in twelve years to electrify a vote, and so in case you have a topic with the way the conflict has been mishandled blame your very own please. it may in basic terms be that in spite of packing the final court its seems you would be unable to in basic terms ban abortions that endanger the wellness of the mummy. no longer something much less would look to do, so Republican judges,Congress, even the President can do no longer something interior the face of such stubbornness, no longer something wanting insisting women persons die will in certainty drift the boat of the so-referred to as professional-lifers. sure, Democrats do desire to honor the sacrifices the warriors have made, yet for the 1st time in my 60 year memory we've not any pictures of rows of solemn flag draped coffins to hold a tear to ones eye in remembrance. those pictures, so touching in different wars, have been banned via the Bush administration as, by surprise, being 'disrespectful'. So then, became it 'disrespectful' in all the different wars? Or is this conflict by some potential something which we're not inspired to look to heavily at, something that may not undergo the scrutiny of history? I subject greater, i'd desire to confess, with reference to the residing, respiratory, human with household initiatives and lives, than approximately an embryo or fetus. it is the way i'm, no apologies approximately that, and that i do no longer insist on regulations that tension abortions, to any extent further than i desire you to insist on regulations that tension childbirth.

2016-10-03 06:14:47 · answer #5 · answered by kroner 4 · 0 0

They contradict themselves and don't think things through. They think abortion is a sin when the bible doesn't condemn it and like to spew out hatred, they forget Jesus's words "judge not, lest ye be judged". You are going to be slam for this and you're going to get insults but don't worry they don't think. If you look closely at their answers they're all the same!

2006-11-03 14:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by cynical 6 · 0 0

I view these as two distinct issues. I think plenty of pro-life people are opposed to the war in Iraq and vice versa.

Why do liberals make such leaps of logic?

2006-11-03 10:19:32 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 3 1

That is nice, you are comparing the life of an innocent child, who has no idea about right or wrong, to evil people who knowlingly plot the demise of free society. Come up with a better agrument.

You should find out more about the real story in Iraq, you know the one that the know-it all Hollywood liberals and CNN idiots refuse to tell you.

If you really care to know the truth, here is a video about all the good we are doing in Iraq.

http://www.glennbeck.com/realstory/iraq-video.shtml

2006-11-03 10:16:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

ill try this once more, also promise you will read "the connection" which shows the link between osama and Saddam. anyway.

those that are dying in Iraq are full grown men, they have less potential to reach there perfection, as to Say the terrorists have already been brainwashed to kill all Americans, there is NOTHING that will change there mind, any potentiality for them to reach their true perfection is gone.

However, in the case of a child, there is nothing but potential for perfection. This child that you just sucked out with a vacuum cleaner, could have been the one person that could cure aids, or find a treatment for cancer, but we will not no, because there potential was removed before it had a chance to even begin.

2006-11-03 10:13:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Born into sin... What about the unborn? If they aren't born yet, then they are protected against that, right?

I'm opposed to abortion, but, I believe the law that allows it should be left in place. However, you left yourself open to a criticism, there, and I felt you needed to know about it.

2006-11-03 10:15:20 · answer #10 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 1 1

Because the military is voluntary and the brave men and women that serve in our armed forces know the risks of what they face.

Unborn babies have no choice, they are forced into the decision of the mother whom usually is not in a proper state of mind to make those kinds of decisions or many mothers that are uninformed of all of their options.

2006-11-03 10:18:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers