English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

i dunno -- considering neocons latest trend seems to be lying about taking it up the butt from meth selling prostitutes.

2006-11-03 09:27:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

Name me one married man on this earth who wouldn't lie under oath about getting a BJ from his secretary - any person would lie and lie and lie and lie and lie and lie some more until the issue either went away or they were faced with undeniable proof (at which point they would break down and cry and beg for god's forgiveness and your sympathy.)

This ought not to be a matter of party politics. That any of you can think there is no comparison because Bill was under oath and George wasn't when he lied better get your heads out of your b u ms and see the real scary world you're in.

2006-11-03 09:42:12 · answer #2 · answered by Lee 4 · 2 1

Yes the "Neocons" the most evil group of people alive. First of all if you asked a Neocon if Bush lied about war they would say no. You should understand the Neocons before you ask about them.

2006-11-03 09:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by Alexander 1 · 2 2

Because they know they will get support from the majority with very little "spin" on the facts , (that's right folks....I am talking about you.....just nod your head like you have a opinion , and say BAAAAAAHHH like the sheep you are !!!) And remember to pay your taxes!!! the G-dubbs need your support !!! BTW...convenced....Get a clue...it was just a witch-hunt...(any other prez. would have had ken stars head in a pickel-jar , sitting on a shelf in the game-room of the white-house !!! I bet you still believe that ronnie raygun "didn't know???" don't cha????

2006-11-03 09:46:08 · answer #4 · answered by budlowsbro420 4 · 2 1

Hey, "convinced". You're an idiot. How many Presidents who got a b.j. from a woman other than their wife (pretty much all of them) ever had it dragged before the Supreme Court, and if they had how many would have come clean about it?

2006-11-03 09:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by socrates 6 · 2 0

Why do Libs forget about all the reasons for the war and just focus on WMD's (which the best evidence at the time said they had so it's pretty vague to call that a lie)

2006-11-03 09:33:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Hmmmm. What did the neocons all lie about?

By the way, did you check out the NYT story this morning that confirms Saddam was about a year away from having a nuke in 2002? It's a "blast".

2006-11-03 09:26:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

You are generalising a bit. It is just part of general mudslinging.

2006-11-03 11:04:03 · answer #8 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 1 1

Becasue they have no Idea...Tthey have never recieved one.....Who would give a BJ to some nasty, crusty old, stingy Republican...I mean besides ann coulter and Katherine Harris and Mark Foley...Other than those 3 ...No one...

2006-11-03 09:28:53 · answer #9 · answered by LENNON3804 3 · 3 4

why do libtards think it was about sex in the oval office??? why do libtards forget that their God bubba perjured himself...lied under oath was disbarred and impeached ...all because he lied to the American people and lied under oath.....why do libtards not realize that lying under oath is a crime?

2006-11-03 09:35:31 · answer #10 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0 3

What the heck are you talking about?

2006-11-03 09:30:44 · answer #11 · answered by Amy Y 6 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers